[lamps] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Thu, 04 January 2018 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF0A12D879; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 06:47:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses@ietf.org, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, lamps-chairs@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com, spasm@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151507723820.23678.730726448053216801.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 06:47:18 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/zb00CzrJro6K7Cvv_-pOBWM0TjI>
Subject: [lamps] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-?= =?utf-8?q?ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:47:18 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't know much about this subject, so I'm balloting 'No Objection', however,
section 4 and section 6 read to me that this doc should update RFC5280. Please
check!