[lamps] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Thu, 04 January 2018 14:47 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses@ietf.org, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, lamps-chairs@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com, spasm@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151507723820.23678.730726448053216801.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 06:47:18 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/zb00CzrJro6K7Cvv_-pOBWM0TjI>
Subject: [lamps] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't know much about this subject, so I'm balloting 'No Objection', however,
section 4 and section 6 read to me that this doc should update RFC5280. Please
check!

[lamps] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-i… Mirja Kühlewind
Re: [lamps] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Russ Housley
Re: [lamps] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)