IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Speechsc] (no subject)

sreekanth <sreekanthm@huawei.com> Wed, 06 December 2006 06:27 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GrqFv-0004QD-2e; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:27:47 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GrqFu-0004Q8-9E for speechsc@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:27:46 -0500
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([61.144.161.53]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GrqFp-0002hs-UV for speechsc@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:27:46 -0500
Received: from huawei.com (szxga01-in [172.24.2.3]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J9U00M8Z9OTHH@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for speechsc@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:22:05 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.18]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J9U001B19OS7H@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for speechsc@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:22:05 +0800 (CST)
Received: from HTIPL20760 ([10.18.4.165]) by szxml03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0J9U00FCP9OP7T@szxml03-in.huawei.com> for speechsc@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:22:04 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 11:52:01 +0530
From: sreekanth <sreekanthm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Speechsc] (no subject)
To: "Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi)" <sarvi@cisco.com>, Dan Burnett <dan_burnett2000@yahoo.com>
Message-id: <002c01c718fe$d802cb10$a504120a@china.huawei.com>
Organization: huawei
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <C6A1C20DB743364EB446E923B2229FEF02AEFF71@xmb-sjc-229.amer.cisco.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 926f893f9bbbfa169f045f85f0cdb955
Cc: speechsc@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: speechsc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sreekanth <sreekanthm@huawei.com>
List-Id: Speech Services Control Working Group <speechsc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speechsc>, <mailto:speechsc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:speechsc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:speechsc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speechsc>, <mailto:speechsc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1180751839=="
Errors-To: speechsc-bounces@ietf.org

Hi sarvi,

1) In section, 11.11. VERIFY-FROM-BUFFER of the draft says...

For VERIFY-FROM-BUFFER method, the server MAY optionally return an "IN-PROGRESS" response before the "VERIFICATION-COMPLETE" event.

As per the above statement , Can MRCP server send VERIFICATION-COMPLETE without sending any 2xx response ?..

MRCP Client                            MRCP server

          -------------VERIFY-FROM-BUFFER------------------------->

          <-------VERIFICATION-COMPLETE-----------------


2) Can server send  INTERPRETATION-COMPLETE without any 2xx response for INTERPRET method ??

Pls clarify on this..

Thanking you in Advance.

Sreekanth


This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) 
  To: sreekanth ; Dan Burnett 
  Cc: speechsc@ietf.org 
  Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 6:40 AM
  Subject: RE: [Speechsc] (no subject)


  No. 
  SPEAK-COMPLETE makes sense only if there was a 200 response meaning that the request was initiated successfully.
  i.e. SPEAK-COMPLETE makes sense if the resource was in a IN-PROGRESS/PENDING state.

  Sarvi



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: sreekanth [mailto:sreekanthm@huawei.com] 
    Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:04 PM
    To: Dan Burnett; Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi)
    Cc: speechsc@ietf.org
    Subject: [Speechsc] (no subject)
    Importance: High


    Hi,


    Can the MRCP server send SPEAK-COMPLETE without sending 200 responses (IN-PROGRESS or PENDING state)...


    MRCP Client                            MRCP server

               -------------SPEAK------------------------->

               <-------SPEAK-COMPLETE-----------

    Can this happen in any error sceneriao(any server side failure)????

    Pls clarify on this....


    Regards,
    Sreekanth




_______________________________________________
Speechsc mailing list
Speechsc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speechsc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email