IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] #13: RFC 4408: Best-Guess SPF

Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com> Thu, 01 March 2012 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <spf2@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DE021F85A4 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 03:59:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.586
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.586 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e3L0nJav9f6f for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 03:58:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (mailout03.controlledmail.com [208.43.65.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D3721F858D for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 03:58:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51437D04083; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 05:58:59 -0600 (CST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2007-00; t=1330603139; bh=tvjZ6OmUzDgRA+qXRwyLFbSq5OsbpUnibG5ZCwxzqyk=; h=References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Subject:From:Date:To:Message-ID; b=GorC4SM3aX4sLgraJfYinr8zK9zgguo/qEJGtaLE1UYXUXKuKVP8yAdDErtmyFMi0 Ksgd0MEfIL/dkSKeQDYuVULC7XA1WM3AWcBt84pzxqBeFBZ9b6SlYuisd30b9VF9ue Ru0HXAoAl6VFa96K7mJGLAJijXO0Ktwi2NE5pzqU=
Received: from [192.168.111.101] (static-72-81-252-21.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 124C8D0400C; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 05:58:58 -0600 (CST)
References: <061.719f414678a2a3c3c3d2dc6e92664f49@tools.ietf.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20120229092526.0aa771f0@elandnews.com> <233d984c-214e-4ae5-ab1c-73649018fd47@email.android.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120229231251.0add09a8@elandnews.com> <4F4F3044.7090505@isdg.net>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <4F4F3044.7090505@isdg.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 06:59:08 -0500
To: spfbis@ietf.org
Message-ID: <853e8b27-e0dc-41d9-b0e6-2c082c049da3@email.android.com>
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: Re: [spfbis] #13: RFC 4408: Best-Guess SPF
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 11:59:00 -0000

Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> wrote:

>S Moonesamy wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>> At 10:33 29-02-2012, Dave Crocker wrote:
>>> please at leat define it.
>> 
>> I have been asked what "Hold for document update" means.  The working
>
>> group does not have any WG draft up for discussion yet.  When there
>is a 
>> WG draft, the working group can discuss about the exact text that
>goes 
>> into it.
>
>Just to confirm and inform the WG, the SPF-BIS WG charter concluding 
>paragraph would be incorrect and the cited 4408bis draft is out of
>scope?
>
>     An initial draft of an updated SPF specification document is
>     draft-kitterman-4408bis. The working group may choose to
>     use this document as a basis for their specification.

It says the working group may. For reasons that aren't clear to me, the working group hasn't even discussed it yet. Nothing wrong with the charter.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email