IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] #13: RFC 4408: Best-Guess SPF

Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> Thu, 01 March 2012 08:15 UTC

Return-Path: <hsantos@isdg.net>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13AE21E802F for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 00:15:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.147
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.452, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pt5P91r--COs for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 00:15:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.catinthebox.net (catinthebox.net [208.247.131.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940F221E8019 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 00:15:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=isdg.net; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/relaxed; l=756; t=1330589733; h=Received:Received: Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:To:Subject: List-ID; bh=KvQCxBjo6fTc8ZFr/ZRmR4WnqXI=; b=wqcbPhBKGPfA9yuRCxJT GVWGHDn0SIlMe0XusbwxVXLTx0kri+2apc+L0CKPcY46nKvpOkD5+y8LqUmJj8SH tU2uNtHb8CZxofwi8AFZB5G+pJsKBXCdqwJ+AtUBFInvOky9WhXFrJbsKJLzgPUs j0miDHq3IZrE2T5IjzkYq0k=
Received: by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.4.454.1) for spfbis@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 03:15:33 -0500
Authentication-Results: dkim.winserver.com; dkim=pass header.d=beta.winserver.com header.s=tms1 header.i=beta.winserver.com; adsp=pass policy=all author.d=isdg.net asl.d=beta.winserver.com;
Received: from opensite.winserver.com ([208.247.131.23]) by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v6.4.454.1) with ESMTP id 3791570030.96536.1864; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 03:15:32 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=beta.winserver.com; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/relaxed; l=756; t=1330589478; h=Received:Received: Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:To:Subject:List-ID; bh=zTOsqp8 voBoaN58HQKzPO2NDxBGCH9PBxSfJVFy44h0=; b=HS2xTz034D79qg2F9y+4hqi yz5qfOrv5NDb4eIsEeIeV4KCPZXbdoBYw13cWOHC/3xYRhSf/RestwgzufYPzpgX iz9dnhM24zZHVSDuBFBRJg7LOLncGt2wayh44Kh43wqT+a/IV35SwMFxHK/AktkO wkCxn9JkH4m+4yo8IjYY=
Received: by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.4.454.1) for spfbis@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 03:11:18 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([99.3.147.93]) by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v6.4.454.1) with ESMTP id 95532971.20089.5188; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 03:11:16 -0500
Message-ID: <4F4F3044.7090505@isdg.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 03:16:04 -0500
From: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
Organization: Santronics Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: spfbis@ietf.org
References: <061.719f414678a2a3c3c3d2dc6e92664f49@tools.ietf.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20120229092526.0aa771f0@elandnews.com> <233d984c-214e-4ae5-ab1c-73649018fd47@email.android.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120229231251.0add09a8@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120229231251.0add09a8@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [spfbis] #13: RFC 4408: Best-Guess SPF
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 08:15:44 -0000

S Moonesamy wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> At 10:33 29-02-2012, Dave Crocker wrote:
>> please at leat define it.
> 
> I have been asked what "Hold for document update" means.  The working 
> group does not have any WG draft up for discussion yet.  When there is a 
> WG draft, the working group can discuss about the exact text that goes 
> into it.

Just to confirm and inform the WG, the SPF-BIS WG charter concluding 
paragraph would be incorrect and the cited 4408bis draft is out of scope?

     An initial draft of an updated SPF specification document is
     draft-kitterman-4408bis. The working group may choose to
     use this document as a basis for their specification.


-- 
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email