[spfbis] How about using SurveyMonkey to ask mail admins how they use SPF?

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Tue, 24 April 2012 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3847021F87C4 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.120, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sdspCCWo6uvs for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (mail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CDE21F8755 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=test; t=1335283217; bh=VE1rxD27HUHFT3lg+2zJG2YMUQxnU2DO7JoDIW8daR8=; l=5451; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Mime-Version:To; b=fnLQNie0PTHOIU8GMsIc0wrSvs1FD0MCPS8Tlx6j+Q98NN6OoCjZeXypKyKkuIYVb C1JuNG0o7J7oGDlbSmsmJsILY06ryu6m/PbJeY079nB6wezgk6Hk4xyegrP761Mw4M Tv7YqI8KAk0sgnkPmaBOw352kk7e5HoQxGgRfkhI=
Received: from [172.25.197.158] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.158]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 515, TLS: TLS1.0,256bits,RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:00:16 +0200 id 00000000005DC048.000000004F96CE10.0000570D
Message-ID: <4F96CE10.8060703@tana.it>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:00:16 +0200
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_north-22285-1335283216-0001-2"
To: spfbis <spfbis@ietf.org>
Subject: [spfbis] How about using SurveyMonkey to ask mail admins how they use SPF?
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:00:24 -0000

Murray amd all,

we often concluded that it's not feasible to complement the experiment
I-D with data about SPF checks deployment.  Perhaps, we can just ask
it, no?

I attach proposed questions.  Opinions?