Re: [spring] CRH and Unified SID - Follow up email
程伟强 <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Thu, 21 November 2019 07:13 UTC
Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92CF3120977 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:13:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sYRfaz5urlKf for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:13:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763A9120970 for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:13:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.15]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee45dd6391c07a-887c4; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:13:32 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee45dd6391c07a-887c4
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com ( [221.130.253.251] ) by ajax-webmail-syy-appsvr08-11008 (Richmail) with HTTP; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:13:28 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:13:28 +0800
From: 程伟强 <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: "Andrew.Alston" <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
Cc: spring <spring@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <2b005dd6268dd55-00036.Richmail.00000050444401711901@chinamobile.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1811141_268503033.1574320408171"
X-Priority: 3
X-RM-TRANSID: 2b005dd6268dd55-00036
X-RM-OA-ENC-TYPE: 0
X-RM-FontColor: 0
X-CLIENT-INFO: X-TIMING=0&X-MASSSENT=0&X-SENSITIVE=0
X-Mailer: Richmail_Webapp(V2.0.27)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/4lwy0hIbXZ-rrDALJigsFaEhCzQ>
Subject: Re: [spring] CRH and Unified SID - Follow up email
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:13:49 -0000
Hi Andrew,Thank you very much for your clarification. Surely, we would like to have more technical discussion and we also welcome more discussion on the topic with who are interested in it. The topic how to improve the SRv6 solution is really important for the carriers who hope to deploy it. B.R. Weiqiang Cheng -[spring] CRH and Unified SID - Follow up email -Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>| Thu, 21 November 2019 06:50 UTC|Show header -Hi Guys, I just wanted to clarify something that we are being asked on both sides from various quarters. The announcement made earlier does not indicate that we are doing a merge of the documents, what it means is that we have agreed to technical discussions to explore a way forward and are working towards common cause to the benefit of the general community, rather than at odds with each other and from a conflict stance. We will advise in due course the exact nature and outcome of said discussions Thanks Andrew