Re: [spring] CRH and Unified SID Draft
程伟强 <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Thu, 21 November 2019 06:51 UTC
Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C85C12080B for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:51:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1F5rB-KDe9Wa for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:51:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F26F1209EF for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:51:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.15]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app06-12006 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee65dd633ca531-87bab; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:50:50 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee65dd633ca531-87bab
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com ( [221.130.253.251] ) by ajax-webmail-syy-appsvr08-11008 (Richmail) with HTTP; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:50:50 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:50:50 +0800
From: 程伟强 <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: spring <spring@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <2b005dd6268dd55-0001c.Richmail.00000020044451312901@chinamobile.com>
References: <1C29741D-4B19-4DFC-8EBA-E7B3F6B485B5@liquidtelecom.com>, <06CF729DA0D6854E8C1E5121AC3330DFAF47369F@dggemm509-mbx.china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1807959_2039822517.1574319050420"
X-Priority: 3
X-RM-TRANSID: 2b005dd6268dd55-0001c
X-RM-OA-ENC-TYPE: 0
X-RM-FontColor: 0
X-CLIENT-INFO: X-TIMING=0&X-MASSSENT=0&X-SENSITIVE=0
X-Mailer: Richmail_Webapp(V2.0.27)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/adGZyO34Ara5BETa56Lxs_TJ4gw>
Subject: Re: [spring] CRH and Unified SID Draft
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 06:51:11 -0000
Hi All, On behalf of authors of the Unified SID draft, we didnot get any agreement with the authors of Compressed routing header draft. We were happy to have technical discussion. There maybe mis-understanding. We welcome any comments to our draft. So sorry for interrupting you. B.R. Authors of Unified SID draft 发件人: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Andrew Alston 发送时间: 2019年11月21日 13:48 收件人: spring@ietf.org 主题: [spring] CRH and Unified SID Draft Hi All, Cognizant of the fact that there has been some concern about drafts pulling in other directions and the number of drafts that address a similar issue, the authors of the Unified SID draft and the authors of the compressed routing header draft have had discussions, and would now like to state that we have agreed in combination to work together towards common cause. Yours Sincerely Andrew Alston / Greg Mirsky
- [spring] CRH and Unified SID Draft Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] CRH and Unified SID Draft 程伟强