[spring] Relationship between draft-cheng-spring-srv6-policy-resource-gurantee and draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 10 October 2023 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F45C14CE5E; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1uqBq_iVBLIi; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92849C14CE33; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-27cfb36c0d4so386081a91.2; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1696966807; x=1697571607; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aroS8qg9KjuE44FpEh+W0S/ZnzQ9aODIpWm6F/Z4q7E=; b=jlIOGo4FOaFsI+LOG4GkIgS50Xo6vYurcPc77yUJWLaN9OEJWNG7/6n+feF2YXvwc+ Isyv1Aw4axRwYOPVrbCllC5WVzM5BHN58gUNjdzt4/vUbVX9DsefhLVK0DxA2ULGRvuX tsmSpPrkR+OFI+cvYwMBZ3jZ/CNTdmV7x/7Q9k6zHF/AvSwa/qiyCnWAUheDHwtBaxCK nXismzoxZ7xyyBJMpwJkH112ot/uCE9ujvHSFe+Qm+MSd2BrE8IsL0Ks8ApuGehXgbea M5KinTsF2YpYfRdQ+HpLl8TvvFJNn52aFEc2No7BZQXxu4Doncy6YbB9XFwI896X4lG7 n1ww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696966807; x=1697571607; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=aroS8qg9KjuE44FpEh+W0S/ZnzQ9aODIpWm6F/Z4q7E=; b=MfLwoAnrLeaeZwQFVyqribPTvlYC4Bzcn8pxO67EwShLaDf3hjBBpQyJ8lOo2KJz3q agW39Yjv6eRohhNP7PzC2HBW7119Y0gFAmpwjc51AXzmiuVMdjylZhuKeJkk3UkaMIyW K7sh9tEzEes3mU0CoOlwr8Rwy6fLuJKWNWpj4N12GkdcE6ZvwJxD758l/06npcrm5It/ nHnKVIwR9A76qRzwuN+ydmpv5j9qqVFUIinLJpgVSe23z3mQAZHE5a2vP26D9zDtLLk/ Fpkjp6XAshK8OaZIXXquf6wRrkxhy5CmxhWUhKMsUdsS5FK93Fvf6RTxd3JNUmdGihDF IX6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwGZ52xcHFeh1KSDO5RHNcb0J/PdemREEwGuf2igb7ZuZHYqExl 4NOCEXfiOchBG1UgifW3kxIWeEmBxeVNekR2AezLqdHH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE3RlWCbaSv6Ck/H2y7uMPD/4we8hlQ70qOaUJ25bcYUKgoHyMmu8aYKH0e30Ss+SB6xrt9iUS7Hiez/4hJbtM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:517:b0:27c:ed3f:a73c with SMTP id r23-20020a17090b051700b0027ced3fa73cmr2265827pjz.42.1696966807262; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 19:40:05 +0000
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 19:40:05 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMMESsyRPsR1Za63TWZrK14o6JurbaFgY=SRQ5bCjsY0B0SDEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-cheng-spring-srv6-policy-resource-gurantee@ietf.org
Cc: spring <spring@ietf.org>, spring-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/95JErJKWm8CYbwESqjgA9pskMzQ>
Subject: [spring] Relationship between draft-cheng-spring-srv6-policy-resource-gurantee and draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 19:40:16 -0000

Dear authors (of draft-cheng-spring-srv6-policy-resource-gurantee):

Hi!

Building on Jie's comments at IETF 115 [1] and this text from the
Introduction: "On the basis of
[I-D.ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments], this document defines a new
SRv6 Endpoint behavior...", please clarify the relationship between
these 2 documents.

Is this document an instantiation of a use case already covered by
I-D.ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments, or is it a new application?
Do we need this new extension, or is
I-D.ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments enough?  Why do we need a
separate document?  Should the use case defined here be part of the
already adopted document?

We (chairs) would like to hear comments from the authors of both
documents and the WG in general.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-115-spring/#network-resource-programming-with-srv6-10-mins