[spring] [Errata Verified] RFC8402 (7671)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 09 October 2023 19:29 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8228C151065; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 12:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=0.732, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id peLBJxHF65Bh; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 12:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21A01C14CE42; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 12:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id D0222E629D; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 12:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
To: aretana.ietf@gmail.com, cfilsfil@cisco.com, stefano@previdi.net, ginsberg@cisco.com, bruno.decraene@orange.com, stephane.litkowski@orange.com, robjs@google.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: james.n.guichard@futurewei.com, iesg@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org, iana@iana.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20231009192931.D0222E629D@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 12:29:31 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/jYL6hoti3w94S-BgusXOm7QrHxA>
Subject: [spring] [Errata Verified] RFC8402 (7671)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 19:29:36 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC8402, "Segment Routing Architecture". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7671 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2023-10-09 Verified by: James N Guichard (IESG) Section: 4.1 Original Text ------------- A likely use case for the BGP-Prefix segment is an IGP-free hyper- scale spine-leaf topology where connectivity is learned solely via BGP [RFC7938] Corrected Text -------------- A likely use case for the BGP-Prefix segment is an IGP-free hyper- scale spine-leaf topology where connectivity is learned solely via BGP [RFC7938]. Notes ----- The period is missing at the end of the sentence. -------------------------------------- RFC8402 (draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-15) -------------------------------------- Title : Segment Routing Architecture Publication Date : July 2018 Author(s) : C. Filsfils, Ed., S. Previdi, Ed., L. Ginsberg, B. Decraene, S. Litkowski, R. Shakir Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Source Packet Routing in Networking Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [spring] [Errata Verified] RFC8402 (7671) RFC Errata System