IETF Logo Mail Archive

[spring] Fwd: IETF SPRING - Liaison statement from ITU-T SG11: LS on recent network OAM related developments in Q13/11 of SG11: one non-consensus contribution

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Fri, 16 April 2021 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526E73A2518 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 09:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ej4twtic9WW for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 09:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 958483A2C4B for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 09:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FMMSY5xxFz6G9th for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 09:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1618591341; bh=Lexna5vsJ6FOVuvFPPP6y8v1EGmvs64aNig3sZgk5dE=; h=Subject:References:To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ivo7Z4vixfdEA0ev73oR13K0KKZNozhGkRiZwl6U8OybZbDRiQoN01E0XG+F7N2Cg tmL2ci36xVr0RavJ0y6GgGc8d1TahqvYHVtznNjuzhJ8FLDEf/lkPriofRHY00CCSX C9MNU06NGtAJY/DDXGryTKcPslCXTrtktEBLHcjU=
X-Quarantine-ID: <mJRazNiKX_pG>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.128.43] (unknown [50.225.209.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FMMSW4Gpzz6G9tT for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 09:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
References: <GV0P278MB054473DF51B3F6F57691CB57BE749@GV0P278MB0544.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <GV0P278MB054473DF51B3F6F57691CB57BE749@GV0P278MB0544.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Message-ID: <bfdd5978-0f0e-4215-e286-c5cc04c03e02@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 12:42:18 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <GV0P278MB054473DF51B3F6F57691CB57BE749@GV0P278MB0544.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------6C72B6C0651F5447941393CD"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/9lw7NwHkFq_H-8KW9ybUA-WYhKY>
Subject: [spring] Fwd: IETF SPRING - Liaison statement from ITU-T SG11: LS on recent network OAM related developments in Q13/11 of SG11: one non-consensus contribution
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:42:36 -0000

I just realized that this liaison from ITU-T SG11 did not actually get 
to the SPRING list.  So I am forwarding it now.  Apologies for the delay.
Apparently, some of the involved parties really want an answer from the 
IETF.

Thank you,
Joel


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	IETF SPRING - Liaison statement from ITU-T SG11: LS on recent 
network OAM related developments in Q13/11 of SG11: one non-consensus 
contribution
Date: 	Thu, 8 Apr 2021 11:29:15 +0000
From: 	TSB SG11 Secretariat, ITU <tsbsg11@itu.int>
To: 	bruno.decraene@orange.com <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, 
james.n.guichard@futurewei.com <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>, 
jmh@joelhalpern.com <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
CC: 	aretana@cisco.com <aretana@cisco.com>, jgs@juniper.net 
<jgs@juniper.net>, pengshuping@huawei.com <pengshuping@huawei.com>, 
akouch <akouch@mail.ru>, shimr@chinatelecom.cn <shimr@chinatelecom.cn>, 
Andreev, Denis <denis.andreev@itu.int>, TSB SG11 Secretariat, ITU 
<tsbsg11@itu.int>



Dear colleagues,

At its meeting [Virtual, 17-26 March 2021], ITU-T SG11 agreed to the 
attached liaison statement to be sent to IETF SPRING.

[sp16-sg11-oLS-00184]: LS on recent network OAM related developments in 
Q13/11 of SG11: one non-consensus contribution.

Best regards,

Carolina.

ITU-T SG11 Secretariat.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email