[spring] [Errata Rejected] RFC8355 (5380)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 03 November 2018 11:10 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63027124BAA; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 04:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TBSFoiFYR4Zp; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 04:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6687512008A; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 04:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 91A9EB81953; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 04:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: jwbensley@gmail.com, cfilsfil@cisco.com, stefano@previdi.net, bruno.decraene@orange.com, robjs@google.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, iesg@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20181103110955.91A9EB81953@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2018 04:09:55 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/FTV1zQSiVvHrKN8i3E1BU6bzbHo>
Subject: [spring] [Errata Rejected] RFC8355 (5380)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2018 11:10:10 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8355, "Resiliency Use Cases in Source Packet Routing in Networking (SPRING) Networks". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5380 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Editorial Reported by: James Bensley <jwbensley@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2018-06-06 Rejected by: Martin Vigoureux (IESG) Section: 3.2 Original Text ------------- An alternative protection strategy consists in management-free local protection that is aimed at providing a repair for the destination based on the shortest path to the destination. Corrected Text -------------- An alternative protection strategy exists in management-free local protection Notes ----- --VERIFIER NOTES-- No justification given to justify the need for the change. -------------------------------------- RFC8355 (draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-12) -------------------------------------- Title : Resiliency Use Cases in Source Packet Routing in Networking (SPRING) Networks Publication Date : March 2018 Author(s) : C. Filsfils, Ed., S. Previdi, Ed., B. Decraene, R. Shakir Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Source Packet Routing in Networking Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [spring] [Errata Rejected] RFC8355 (5380) RFC Errata System
- Re: [spring] [Errata Rejected] RFC8355 (5380) Alexander Vainshtein