[spring] What needs to be renamed -- Re: draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus: Renaming

Ron,

I don't understand why changing the filename should be an issue, isn't
it the title of the document that needs to be changed?

And the approximately 100 time the term "SRv6+" is used in the document.

/Loa

On 18/11/2019 12:05, Ron Bonica wrote:
> Darren,
> 
> No problem. We will change the filename next time we update the document.
> 
>                                                      Ron
> 
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddukes@cisco.com>
> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2019 8:36 PM
> To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
> Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>; draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus@ietf.org
> Subject: draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus: Renaming
> 
> Hi Ron and SRm6 authors.
> 
> The use of the name “SRv6+” is still causing confusion amongst the community, and even during presentations by the authors of this series of drafts (eg NANOG).
> It needs to be changed in the doc names and removed from further presentations.
> 
> This was promised in this thread.
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/DNfkjnGMHbmJx2dL8KY_pseFyzM__;!8WoA6RjC81c!TO6Y432l65MppFAzk6ouvlJPd2AC_TMHeOXuTOvwpoCfdOuSDYGLoyVLj0Bii58r$
> 
> Thanks for closing this.
>    Darren
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
> 

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64