Re: [spring] What needs to be renamed -- Re: draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus: Renaming

Ron,

I thought I made a canonical search, but must have picked up an old
version.

Sorry.

/Loa

On 19/11/2019 00:26, Ron Bonica wrote:
> Hi Loa,
> 
> I just did a scan of the latest document version (i.e., draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus-06).
> 
> The title is "Segment Routing Mapped To IPv6 (SRm6)".
> 
> The string "SRv6+" three times. These are:
> 
> - Once in a Section Header (i.e., "Differences Between SRv6 and SRv6+"). This was an oversight. When I did a global search and replace, XMLMind didn't catch section headers.
> 
> - Once in the table of contents. This was a consequence of the first oversight.
> 
> - Once in a reference to another draft that has not been updated yet.
> 
>                                                                                                     Ron
> 
> 
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 12:55 AM
> To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>; Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddukes@cisco.com>
> Cc: draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus@ietf.org; SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
> Subject: What needs to be renamed -- Re: [spring] draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus: Renaming
> 
> Ron,
> 
> I don't understand why changing the filename should be an issue, isn't it the title of the document that needs to be changed?
> 
> And the approximately 100 time the term "SRv6+" is used in the document.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> On 18/11/2019 12:05, Ron Bonica wrote:
>> Darren,
>>
>> No problem. We will change the filename next time we update the document.
>>
>>                                                       Ron
>>
>>
>> Juniper Business Use Only
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddukes@cisco.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2019 8:36 PM
>> To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
>> Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>;
>> draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus@ietf.org
>> Subject: draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus: Renaming
>>
>> Hi Ron and SRm6 authors.
>>
>> The use of the name “SRv6+” is still causing confusion amongst the community, and even during presentations by the authors of this series of drafts (eg NANOG).
>> It needs to be changed in the doc names and removed from further presentations.
>>
>> This was promised in this thread.
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spri
>> ng/DNfkjnGMHbmJx2dL8KY_pseFyzM__;!8WoA6RjC81c!TO6Y432l65MppFAzk6ouvlJP
>> d2AC_TMHeOXuTOvwpoCfdOuSDYGLoyVLj0Bii58r$
>>
>> Thanks for closing this.
>>     Darren
>> _______________________________________________
>> spring mailing list
>> spring@ietf.org
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spri
>> ng__;!8WoA6RjC81c!XmkrambL1q1Q66rN0XCqbB5QUVLauLhIwWplEet0gRvXi2OTPrYJ
>> CQRh1oUmg7hQ$
>>
> 

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64