[spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution-01.txt

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Tue, 12 April 2016 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC7612D9DC for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id twqM7T9J78Qa for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8826012D693 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13406; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1460494157; x=1461703757; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=OaJV5MpTGToScp1nWPHyEbWKRk41VCPUg9JkblHBZQ0=; b=NWXTDnvlqBniihCQmbUs39mbesoD+C6/RPprqVacNw8C+1fTYEskPZLe zEF9lUW65pF8w2I2hIZfLEBmFuA5aoO9jLHAdQL44rcXZp/rDhnL7xsxj QnhbyalplrVkX2wsAdkZeHjYFq9KxKSdPDz7SfRKnH5tiSJOr75DnsggJ o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BbAgCiXg1X/4gNJK1egmtMU30GtW+EcwENgXYkhWoCHIEeOBQBAQEBAQEBZRwLhEEBAQEEIwpKDgQCAQgRBAEBKAMCAgIwFAcBAQUDAgQTCIgfAQ6wCpINAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFYYhhEuEbIJTglYFjVCFS4RtAYV2iA+Bbk6EAIhbjyYBHgEBQoIygTVsAYkGAX0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.24,476,1454976000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="92851895"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 12 Apr 2016 20:49:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3CKnGSf021006 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:49:16 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:49:15 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:49:15 -0500
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRlPwMx+rPL72iJUKQZoTc4xsSdJ+GznDw
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:49:15 +0000
Message-ID: <a9d03afcf97e4aef81d289f6a41f35f4@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <20160412203823.32270.61116.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160412203823.32270.61116.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [171.69.35.101]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_a9d03afcf97e4aef81d289f6a41f35f4XCHALN001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/JSfjtdvOYX6RPhiBgpI1AgF7Or8>
Subject: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution-01.txt
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:49:19 -0000

Folks -



New version of the conflict resolution draft has been posted.
Thanx for all the valuable input - we have done our best to respond to all comments received.



   Les





-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 1:38 PM
To: Peter Psenak (ppsenak); Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Martin Pilka; Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution-01.txt





A new version of I-D, draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution-01.txt

has been successfully submitted by Les Ginsberg and posted to the IETF repository.



Name:                  draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution

Revision:              01

Title:                      Segment Routing Conflict Resolution

Document date:               2016-04-12

Group:                  Individual Submission

Pages:                   15

URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution-01.txt

Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution/

Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution-01

Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution-01



Abstract:

   In support of Segment Routing (SR) routing protocols advertise a

   variety of identifiers used to define the segments which direct

   forwarding of packets.  In cases where the information advertised by

   a given protocol instance is either internally inconsistent or

   conflicts with advertisements from another protocol instance a means

   of achieving consistent forwarding behavior in the network is

   required.  This document defines the policies used to resolve these

   occurrences.











Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.



The IETF Secretariat