IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-10

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Fri, 25 August 2017 12:43 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24402132BE6; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 05:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UemBnUPviix2; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 05:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83E17132027; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 05:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1548; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1503665022; x=1504874622; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Y73OI1sXT9T5ogS1yfSVkYgDTQzE0qbSFUZyoNRz1fQ=; b=CQYzHmtTNqg5XU5tHBGsS0yhBAtFnTJY9+UFt0fh3B24RFesiEqFTKNK FMxltieZkhQAJtEBRvPeXfqsYCsp0SQEP048N1KqLHzPBWyeHyOySkjvr efuKeKaDBWTIZJ1sdp90znB8cYOR0GU6W6nzIbqgDhzRxlk/VOk2P0TiA E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DLAQCRGqBZ/4YNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1qBeQeeJYFPIpg3hUcCGoNGQxQBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUZAQQBIxFFBQsCAQgSCAImAgICMBUCDgIEAQ0FiikIrUaCJ4thAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYENgh2CAoFOgg4LgnKICDCCMQWYKYg4ApREDJJaljYBNiGBDXcVWwGHCHaJKYEPAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,425,1498521600"; d="scan'208";a="285095746"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 25 Aug 2017 12:43:41 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7PChfiu013052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:43:41 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 07:43:40 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 07:43:40 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, "draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-10
Thread-Index: AQHTHRnQ0x6IAH5oMUmjFV4q0zWDUKKVFh0A
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:43:40 +0000
Message-ID: <E160D239-311A-4764-BCE2-4E794BD340DF@cisco.com>
References: <74FB72FC-AD69-4EA3-ACA2-739168EE0A44@cisco.com> <ff685857-a90f-1942-eb50-001d5bde83da@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <ff685857-a90f-1942-eb50-001d5bde83da@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.25.0.170815
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.236.208]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <081D823FCBB32944A0745AC3C6E65276@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/OoOUMffVbQP2JvAaMOigpgAaj6s>
Subject: Re: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-10
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:43:44 -0000

On 8/24/17, 4:44 PM, "Martin Vigoureux" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com> wrote:

Martin:

Hi!

> speaking as Shepherd.
> Regarding Q1&Q2: Indeed, Section 2 is the core of the document, and in 
> my view the section containing what is worth standardizing. 

What, exactly, is this document standardizing?

It is probably too late to argue about not having a separate mpls-focused document, so I’m not arguing against publication.  I am also not concerned about the length – it is good to see focused, clear documents.


…
> Regarding Q3: since, as you say, we can not state whether a given piece 
> of IPR is valid or not, I am not sure whether we can discuss the 
> applicability of IPR disclosures (made against other documents) to this 
> document, and vice versa.

Right.  That was a question/observation mostly for the IPR owners.  I’m just wondering whether the declaration was done against the right document since I can’t really tell what is new and different here that was not in the Architecture document.  I’ll be happy with the IPR holders just thinking about it…

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email