Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 15 March 2019 18:12 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDA3130EA3; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1bw_f5mJnWWq; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCD75130E8D; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x2FIBtug014972; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 18:11:55 GMT
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FA122044; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 18:11:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A70B22042; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 18:11:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.237.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x2FIBsA1004743 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Mar 2019 18:11:54 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: bruno.decraene@orange.com, 'SPRING WG' <spring@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org
References: <22596_1552502971_5C8950BB_22596_34_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48A18771@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <22596_1552502971_5C8950BB_22596_34_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48A18771@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 18:11:53 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <058601d4db5a$91c98630$b55c9290$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0587_01D4DB5A.91CA4980"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQKiuZZ85wkSAmxndBno69hsKyy+2qRxNM4Q
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.112.237.8
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24492.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--26.740-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--26.740-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24492.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--26.739500-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: CxmI61mtwh/xIbpQ8BhdbOYAh37ZsBDC9NYqzb2oOWvfc2Xd6VJ+ytj4 ib1EjEkTj2pfT75no3Od/Adu1KMmBnFLR+5Ir1qCjSOVeRIcbV5bUMPBWMyETgv/nTOPQovsuDu 7WG5kccMBqTv1J2BCwIISvbIC3ca2v8ozXMI08IxomJbPMdjPdMESuU5N8eMKnNgWxWMgxzLS7l 9oY/zO1HsLf8bb2vvEtWLt+9LzHVbJzlixzGB5rG8v9IEN8rD2OhJ9m53n4aCY/Ue6G7XIMruKU 5zJgBEnqK3dvipiFD1hMSBHcFZzVEd2G5hiQttMpkIW3Gref33gHtq54uZTQNvpj5+dNlQvAvK0 O9Xf2H6PoYeN4F/i1jQZpk7TGz+52/jjQxlblYSdVNZaI2n6/2Wuy5Lm0L4/4W5wGTKkLKtNoAw QUfnUnECJ3aSnZOHwup0JKg5NXJbcWMSpAQ/nrME0HZEwX4582N80QvcF7LhIxvv8SrrEFiEomW jtbfURRKALQU7Ggv9+du6cT3v4uBmc/STmZAwtPkoysAZgcS+Y65eaG0GWH0curAGvdCX+xUskM LzDnjGHJjZtN5bEKLz4nfyYESe0f6nSw8GgnBdT46Ow+EhYON9WrDP4LKdpGA7uwIZNHQ1cX89d DrF4+W4Kqb0ahB2Jf6WytOayZdvWV8MKb34RlVgowyUWHgGdh+w9Wz/xXDoR8rMICe0qkNQaDtB Vy9LI//nkqRz73/pz3XExg2oeRXupOhUR/AE8e5NWR5iixe25pw2tsxj4tLXvDHySC+eUhzNUKu 2Ue5ogXZNZQIT9C+XbZzu8Xg2bfbBn31Ku2wyeAiCmPx4NwGmRqNBHmBvevqq8s2MNhPDPPeN6H N6d7M+9+OQ9U/5f33fj+sMArfOEbaqKQSlAZezqEOPFl5QlELyxyKTdEQefia8SQf34DIMfQw0s IO1LKe+YFrgD2DY=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/QmfUN1A7QP8Pk2HLxVeuPw7qXPs>
Subject: Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 18:12:06 -0000
Thanks for this poll, Bruno, Before taking up work on this draft, would it be worth working with 6man to check that the repurposing of IPv6 addresses would be unlikely to cause a great fight? It would probably be better to not have two WGs fighting. And, in case someone is confused by my comments, RFC 4291 has. IPv6 addresses are 128-bit identifiers for interfaces and sets of interfaces (where "interface" is as defined in Section 2 of [IPV6]). And RFC 8200 has. interface a node's attachment to a link. and Destination Address 128-bit address of the intended recipient of the packet (possibly not the ultimate recipient, if a Routing header is present). See [RFC4291] and Section 4.4. Now, it is possible that everyone will say "Yeah, go ahead." Or they may say, "You can only do this if you're also updating 4291 and 8200." Or, of course, they may also say, "Whoa, it would be a really big step to address a function or an instruction or something other than an interface, notwithstanding that they are routable." I'm not prejudging what answer we might get, but think it would be worth asking. Best, Adrian From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of bruno.decraene@orange.com Sent: 13 March 2019 18:50 To: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org> Cc: draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org Subject: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming Hi SPRING WG, This email initiates a three week call for working group adoption for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming. (Three weeks to account for the IETF week) Please indicate your support, comments, or objection, for adopting this draft as a working group item by April, 3rd, 2019 (aka 2019-04-03) We are particularly interested in hearing from working group members that are not co-authors of this draft. We are also looking for volunteers who would be ready to perform a technical review of this work at some later stage, such as before or during WG the last call. In parallel to this adoption call, I will send an IPR call for this document. We will need all authors and contributors to confirm their IPR position on this document. There is currently 1 IPR filled (2) (1) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming-0 7 (2) https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?id=draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-netwo rk-programming <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?id=draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-netw ork-programming&submit=draft> &submit=draft Thank you, --Bruno & Rob. ____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
- [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-fi… bruno.decraene
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Peter Psenak
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Siva Sivabalan (msiva)
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Paul Mattes
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Bernier, Daniel
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Ahmed Bashandy
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Gaurav Dawra
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Zhuangshunwan
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Xiejingrong
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Huzhibo
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… YuanChao Su (yuasu)
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Mach Chen
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- [spring] 答复: Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Lizhenbin
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Shyam Sethuram
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Rob Piasecki (rpiaseck)
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Tarek Saad
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Kentaro Ebisawa
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Matsushima Satoru
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… stefano previdi
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… John Leddy
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Ahmed Abdelsalam (ahabdels)
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Andrea Chiarato
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Pier Luigi Ventre
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… bruno.decraene
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draf… bruno.decraene