IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Section 4.16

"Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com> Tue, 15 October 2019 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <pcamaril@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E90120856; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=OaWpxKp/; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=nuoOz3Gx
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LNNJgXgYks33; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A94712083F; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=17841; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1571157935; x=1572367535; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=MlZyS2REOjL9fi5o+mCgh7aazHR7p5r2TGMxCD6tSgQ=; b=OaWpxKp/RmO4Y6TLavvzZNF2NiSB97mkGFGDlNcs1UlkOCsXJN9zLBN0 ++HE+rMF5FF80h1U1En5F2ajJq6nlf7Aruc+n3UQ3ukw6XnFaasdcw1AI q8f2ubbFd0tY8bfp0Ome70kAHVoLqZjKVe13kZ8N34ovLp4ibUTSI9GH1 w=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:SCOIYx0kYSxZJTaxsmDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxKGt+51ggrPWoPWo7JfhuzavrqoeFRI4I3J8RVgOIdJSwdDjMwXmwI6B8vQEUbyKffwbigSF8VZX1gj9Ha+YgBY
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C2AAAY96Vd/5FdJa1mGgEBAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBEQEBAQICAQEBAYF7gRwvUAVsVyAECyqEJYNHA4pMglyCY4cHiTOEYYFCgRADVAkBAQEMAQElCAIBAYRAAheCVyQ4EwIDCQEBBAEBAQIBBQRthS0MhUsBAQEEEhEKEwEBNwEPAgEIEQMBAigDAgICMBQJCAEBBAENBRQOgwABgXlNAy4BDgOjUQKBOIhhdYEygn0BAQWBNAGDUxiCFwMGgTSMDhiBQD+BEiYfgkw+ghpHAgKBLAESAQcvCQ0JglgygiyPcYU5iQ4hjjVBCoIihwqKCoQHG4I6h0+ELIITiHqMf4EyiCOCD48JAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpImdxcBU7KgGCQVAQFIFPg3OFFIU/dAGBKI1pgkUBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,300,1566864000"; d="scan'208,217";a="644292308"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 15 Oct 2019 16:45:34 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (xch-rcd-013.cisco.com [173.37.102.23]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x9FGjX3e004069 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:45:33 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:45:33 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:45:32 -0500
Received: from NAM05-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:45:32 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jx5aniuIPwBPz5tkb7xhdDtojDeqSPo+jFDNFYhjpqN8FxedgO4s8y782tOz5pZppuHmLYHpVUuEA25wZPe0ZtDjP8TkBv2Zk/L4AL1lMO8LzDgM5RNKYGKX2HpWmfpA49vhJV9rlGTQNGBmGGhO1BOdx2/kps238qSnz7YZ6gAP21lo595qsh6PeLl23duPvxrJxBAapex5UByjgTTkiSFRLib4yJsoFkyJ/tGodrR6HGbUDPD89wuPuCsJ+AIqESXp5dxan/zeVAX2aCCBkhmf2vahK7SI6dCleO5OiugluDeppzG282e3oA++pdFpJSReK13gwzfjTrCJCruaUw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=MlZyS2REOjL9fi5o+mCgh7aazHR7p5r2TGMxCD6tSgQ=; b=cnnZNWxqM3507gwtbRL88lixTWSrlgUyQP96mpGihs6+zznNNYZkSXcSPIDsaV2zsISvf/nNgXYS7IIA0EWpzyhWSOwiadynQxORG0ZnfzQjUsv1IGSi4PgCkcbpKlgdODEiXSxRfCKm2yNsijkbLMnFjsX9R49Qpa8qnrSLr3wIUKogbhTI2BG7oz4TTqvfiw253x8GPJcBkNoVaD4/63VxCbfTgrKF2g0S2IeQ+aX6e+VrqMuOYEvGH1xSeZEDBjrfShcYY3boFh0iZbwZfdTrvRKkRt36KPbWITeeXV1OSuqvDsyOSWAVRmkXfIHwnc0QAxYPlUR6Udcs9aw7eg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=MlZyS2REOjL9fi5o+mCgh7aazHR7p5r2TGMxCD6tSgQ=; b=nuoOz3GxOkJq2vqrPz3XRNG8demz1YhVp2LFGbFe+GOFDhkSYgINyIBfHghT33zANKHJV79+taM6qXqfD8u7OYY9QFvxJzXVPIvjxJzPB2GZMviOElyUENhGcmOiQMefeAaaT6ZHKT1xcdoSeMYBtIAlfp4MLNiBusUTKST0o2E=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4094.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.180.202) by MN2PR11MB3776.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.251.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2347.21; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:45:31 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4094.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5de0:4167:1f9e:d7e2]) by MN2PR11MB4094.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5de0:4167:1f9e:d7e2%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2347.023; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:45:31 +0000
From: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>
To: li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
CC: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Section 4.16
Thread-Index: AdWCvuiPDa1a/xxMT66jJXRsDe/6WAAyc9AA
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:45:30 +0000
Message-ID: <B04B94A5-F331-43DC-9B42-EEF60E87EDBA@cisco.com>
References: <BN7PR05MB5699A0BCB61A1D47B7905192AE900@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <HK0PR03MB4066E2363F78EA35ACE2C5F0FC930@HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HK0PR03MB4066E2363F78EA35ACE2C5F0FC930@HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pcamaril@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c0:1004::14]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8b90c34a-72b0-4747-b2e8-08d7518f1762
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3776:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB37763F472C6FE1904FBFD7B3C9930@MN2PR11MB3776.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 01917B1794
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(366004)(189003)(199004)(8676002)(71200400001)(7736002)(6116002)(256004)(478600001)(45080400002)(14454004)(966005)(790700001)(2501003)(33656002)(2906002)(606006)(71190400001)(76116006)(229853002)(91956017)(6436002)(66946007)(54896002)(6306002)(316002)(4001150100001)(6246003)(81156014)(81166006)(66476007)(66556008)(66446008)(64756008)(8936002)(6486002)(36756003)(236005)(476003)(86362001)(25786009)(102836004)(6506007)(99286004)(53546011)(76176011)(486006)(2616005)(446003)(110136005)(11346002)(5660300002)(46003)(6512007)(4326008)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3776; H:MN2PR11MB4094.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: L4BLxmIT6NGLBlfNo/jcx/J5BMC03rw8zp7KiP/2rNyxDMTOeedy573azgU+zuMkaHmvT08cu7Qbgex+Tc50T8HbFHUiZAf5I7KpdCndEjUvwfDcykPpIPSOhvXmVXla6Kp56aBpYEaTaigyYy9jct8GSZeIbNq/RGJN53h1hfRYE1EpOf5L2Ip6cxjp8sX2RlCfHzgGU3KTx/zoI5UkH/L4WEiiKRhBvs1FU+a1gOJ9mY2DWqMhN2dCbw28OOF05DZMWqVbQLqR8NKdqzjBalxCPudvQMDH9DFSjeWl2/zht438NFuCsj77U9b9MWPdZCTxFFLrJMnPBEf3P36ZV79IU7CjR9+f/eWF5OecyMYgc+y5sVHsGD70kGOi4KO/AOcNrD2MhXnfel+ImbT7mf3qHovsatlHsGp9IZ/It3zUpec+fNtkm9Qp7+VM3Y1J3BiJkN4U0T8DjgjZdg41Dw==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B04B94A5F33143DC9B42EEF60E87EDBAciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8b90c34a-72b0-4747-b2e8-08d7518f1762
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Oct 2019 16:45:30.6054 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 5Wcr4PLpLsINmrVVKRv8flHd4fRgcj+QLO62h2wpzphBxWldAxywZMcHR/Ykqmv9CY58mNyBG5xTEDI/MCghxg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3776
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.23, xch-rcd-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/UlqvCEYuaC3vDk8XvTBqBaZXEKw>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Section 4.16
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:45:57 -0000

Li,

I have replied the technical questions regarding PSP and USP in the email thread from one week ago.
You have not provided any technical concern.

> “Further, the example for PSP in the companion doc srv6-net-pgm-illustration is wrong. PSP is used for END.DT4 in the companion doc while flavors are only defined for END, END.X and END.T in srv6-network-programming.”

The illustration in section 2.8.1 is correct. Please re-read it. PSP is used at node 3 together with the End.X behavior.

Regards,
Pablo.

Replies from one week ago:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/V0ZpjVLSVZxHaBwecXFxqJjlg_c
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/WrYzRZC0HKVgBYaYMCQVcTWrfak


From: li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, 15 October 2019 at 09:32
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Section 4.16
Resent from: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
Resent to: <cf@cisco.com>, <pcamaril@cisco.com>, <john@leddy.net>, <daniel.voyer@bell.ca>, <satoru.matsushima@g.softbank.co.jp>, <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
Resent date: Tuesday, 15 October 2019 at 09:32

I suggest this section be removed from this version until the community reaches rough consensus.
Further, the example for PSP in the companion doc srv6-net-pgm-illustration is wrong. PSP is used for END.DT4 in the companion doc while flavors are only defined for END, END.X and END.T in srv6-network-programming.

Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
________________________________
li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com

From: Ron Bonica<mailto:rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Date: 2019-10-15 02:42
To: SPRING WG List<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Section 4.16
Authors,

Lacking the B.INSERT and T.INSERT functions, can you describe a use-case for the PSP and USP flavors of the END, END.X and END.T functions?

                                              Ron



Juniper Business Use Only

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email