Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-01.txt - section 3.1

"Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com> Tue, 01 April 2014 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <sprevidi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE411A068C for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 04:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yILJFtQ3pZK8 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 04:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485EF1A0683 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 04:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1229; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1396353069; x=1397562669; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=N5qztaCEkXTfXvs95RCgBszRyckVqUo6uEzXzQd5U/A=; b=T8HbSUueXPHq6Ekz22DTCsAPoOYVP1r0FCQzQLG/tqb20bRtRfV6BcRa k/RZZlZtzowir8+/HZLw/6lDs3YPwPvpXuSCR3td66AoN3Eletx56QesD zcL+BEssefLysdk9y5zo3Sq8S3almnSFUvGEY3VLvTpxda0/I9OHf8xmk s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AioFAI6mOlOtJA2I/2dsb2JhbABZgwaBEsA4gw6BHRZ0giUBAQEDATo9AhACAQgYHgULMiUCBA4gh1YI0VkXjj0zB4MkgRQBA5Rqg2ySOYFxgT+CKw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,772,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="311247116"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2014 11:51:07 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com [173.37.183.79]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s31Bp5IP031367 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:51:06 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.171]) by xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com ([173.37.183.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 06:51:05 -0500
From: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
To: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-01.txt - section 3.1
Thread-Index: AQHPTaCojy1+kV1IpES0jYaZfb4npQ==
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 11:51:03 +0000
Message-ID: <08D1B3BD-A983-46AF-865E-B630132B91CA@cisco.com>
References: <201403311610.s2VGAEV60522@magenta.juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <201403311610.s2VGAEV60522@magenta.juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.194.105]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <5A9F35C006DE2847A477FBA9C886D304@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/Ye1J1S5hvbPRs_T73BB09hlcaUQ
Cc: "<spring@ietf.org>" <spring@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-01.txt - section 3.1
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 11:51:18 -0000

Hi Yakov,

thanks for you comment. See below.


On Mar 31, 2014, at 6:10 PM, Yakov Rekhter wrote:
>> All,
>> 
>> despite the large consensus draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-00 
>> already got on the list, and in order to address the few comments we
>> received about the lack of use cases details in the draft, the authors 
>> decided to include in the problem-statement draft the use-cases originally 
>> described in draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-use-cases. 
>> 
>> We took the use cases, obviously without any reference to a solution, and 
>> inserted them into the problem statement draft. We will rework the segment
>> routing use cases draft in order not to have duplicated text.
> 
> If indeed you "took the use cases, obviously without any reference
> to a solution", then what is the following from 3.1, but a solution ?
> 
>                        Upon receiving a packet from A destined to Z,
>   PE1 pushes two labels onto the packet: the top label is the Prefix
>   SID attached to 192.168.0.2/32, the bottom label is the VPN label LZ
>   attached to the VPN route Z.


correct and well spotted. I'll fix it asap.

s.


> 
> Yakov.
>