[spring] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-01.txt - section 3.1
Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net> Mon, 31 March 2014 16:10 UTC
Return-Path: <yakov@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D361A0849 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MUOow9G5ARR7 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06941A6F0C for <spring@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail9-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.247) by CH1EHSOBE005.bigfish.com (10.43.70.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:10:26 +0000
Received: from mail9-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail9-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273ECC0343; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:10:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:66.129.239.11; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:P-EMF02-SAC.jnpr.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -2
X-BigFish: VPS-2(zf7Iz1432Izz1f42h2148h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h2146h1202h1e76h2189h1d1ah1d2ah21bch1fc6hzzz31h2a8h839h944hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah1b2fh224fh1fb3h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dc1h1dfeh1dffh1fe8h1ff5h2216h22d0h2336h2438h2461h2487h24d7h2516h2545h255eh25cch25f6h2605h262fh268bh1155h)
Received-SPF: softfail (mail9-ch1: transitioning domain of juniper.net does not designate 66.129.239.11 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.129.239.11; envelope-from=yakov@juniper.net; helo=P-EMF02-SAC.jnpr.net ; SAC.jnpr.net ;
Received: from mail9-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail9-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1396282224331047_7958; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:10:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1EHSMHS024.bigfish.com (snatpool1.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.242]) by mail9-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8EE1E005D; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:10:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from P-EMF02-SAC.jnpr.net (66.129.239.11) by CH1EHSMHS024.bigfish.com (10.43.70.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:10:23 +0000
Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMF02-SAC.jnpr.net (172.24.192.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:10:22 -0700
Received: from juniper.net (sapphire.juniper.net [172.17.28.108]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id s2VGAEV60522; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:10:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yakov@juniper.net)
Message-ID: <201403311610.s2VGAEV60522@magenta.juniper.net>
To: sprevidi@cisco.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <5409.1396282208.1@juniper.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:10:08 -0700
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/a-pc9h5f5fsw9PlHAxRISYJuXBI
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-01.txt - section 3.1
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:10:32 -0000
> All,
>
> despite the large consensus draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-00
> already got on the list, and in order to address the few comments we
> received about the lack of use cases details in the draft, the authors
> decided to include in the problem-statement draft the use-cases originally
> described in draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-use-cases.
>
> We took the use cases, obviously without any reference to a solution, and
> inserted them into the problem statement draft. We will rework the segment
> routing use cases draft in order not to have duplicated text.
If indeed you "took the use cases, obviously without any reference
to a solution", then what is the following from 3.1, but a solution ?
Upon receiving a packet from A destined to Z,
PE1 pushes two labels onto the packet: the top label is the Prefix
SID attached to 192.168.0.2/32, the bottom label is the VPN label LZ
attached to the VPN route Z.
Yakov.
- [spring] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-… Yakov Rekhter
- Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-p… Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)