IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Going back to the original question for the Spring WG (was: Re: Beyond SRv6.)

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Tue, 10 September 2019 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED40E120822 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c_xOYn_LBeUi for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEE021202DD for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681CD4B; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:39:56 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:date:date:subject:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-type:message-id:from:from :received:received; s=mail; t=1568137193; bh=jybnMdSZqddF/6m67Sf S2HvaQ5+jDBpkYLyUxaCQrNw=; b=dBW/JUrjiFCyun0IunPHVVYnc6vazEd7UnJ KEZww9CKo3eBJK00KqB8yj2JWZkmmx/GcNplYGDzONO21tfUNIYgT4XyTaYJH/zb H+80Plfxakm8Wzlp2lZSxwDz0G1eJF5KSqTJZ/ASESKXzEajast3YoWN1W8UA2TS Ecf1+dhY=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id rDwvEtSZ4264; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:39:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:3da0:1927:e392:6f34] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:3da0:1927:e392:6f34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2568D3C; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:39:53 +0200 (CEST)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Message-Id: <40BCFF8C-CDD1-436C-A319-71DCCEE86677@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_05ADBC9E-F030-448D-9D69-F2EC1DDACE12"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:39:52 +0200
In-Reply-To: <2E39DE90-B807-4C16-A83D-FA2DDD162EB4@nokia.com>
Cc: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>, James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>, Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>, Rob Shakir <robjs@google.com>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, "Voyer, Daniel" <daniel.voyer@bell.ca>
To: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>
References: <60A84B32-D306-45DE-B4E2-F68AB570F951@bell.ca> <91AEC553-4E89-49C5-9057-DB0B083C0392@steffann.nl> <CAOj+MMFfLs_R_dEu0h=MnUQT92NEVF9Wq-RzUqASr56BqH5-Wg@mail.gmail.com> <FA5DCB71-6939-4AC6-86FD-A7E326B39B92@steffann.nl> <CAOj+MMHzNQpxo25Ea+=HALS85ahN+R3QRMujc3iTF24e3c6Vzg@mail.gmail.com> <EEBBBEBA-6648-4B5F-B262-E8AEBC7C1946@steffann.nl> <2E39DE90-B807-4C16-A83D-FA2DDD162EB4@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/awG6vB8TS-EcBa--Q-KxR8pAtHQ>
Subject: Re: [spring] Going back to the original question for the Spring WG (was: Re: Beyond SRv6.)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:40:07 -0000

Hi Wim,

> WH> Would you be ok with this? https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-07, support segment routing over IPv4 and/or IPv6.

No, I don't want to have to manage both MPLS and tunnels. That only adds complexity.

Cheers,
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email