Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-07: (with COMMENT)

"Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com> Tue, 01 March 2016 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <sprevidi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B43C1B2D2C; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:25:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xXZ-BFaJ29mS; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:25:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97A4E1B2D27; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:25:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2242; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1456845906; x=1458055506; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Gi0hFbUkFwvBGsB5jA+XkoBZqlWDxP1rlNzIn7aZl8w=; b=bQIR5b+2oenDOw1NbI7m+MLDcoYfmT0X6tg/Cx9160QXKdnadg1O9Bww L0EwIQhHp/2LV/vemKDi1JH6H3EtX8UWqdFlB2H7y/ha86mS4/4j+PzVj 687ehX2aENcrRGSyu7pN/gIiQJUJdRViDJEFT+t/yfDwo8ZFDrNm0smvJ 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AKAgAps9VW/4ENJK1egzpSXg8GuBqCEwENgWYhhXICHIErOBQBAQEBAQEBZCeEQQEBAQMBIxFFBQsCAQgYAgImAgICMBUQAgQOBRuHfAgOsGePGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAREEe4UXgWwIgkaEBREBgx4rgQ8Fh1ePNwGFWIgJgWCERIhSjksBHgEBQoIwgTRqAYcONH4BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,523,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="243591439"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Mar 2016 15:25:05 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u21FP50H002479 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 15:25:05 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:25:05 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:25:04 -0600
From: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-07: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRc82b6c2qFvaduUuAZbKHb6yek59FGgYA
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 15:25:04 +0000
Message-ID: <51518519-D777-47E8-B44B-26420F358618@cisco.com>
References: <20160301151821.31508.40780.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160301151821.31508.40780.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.245.69]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <44F071747575FF40A0FBF02569DD9DDF@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/i67TajABpl-gx5sackQWAgcVu0A>
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, "tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "Pierre Francois (pifranco)" <pifranco@cisco.com>, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, "<draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 15:25:09 -0000

Hi Benoit,

Segment Routing is the solution that addresses the requirements described in the problem-statement draft.

Since the problem-statement draft is not supposed to include any reference to the solution, it has been agreed not to introduce the “Segment Routing” terminology.

I’m fine with adding a statement as you suggest but this is not what has been required during the editing and publication process of draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement.

Thanks.
s.


> On Mar 1, 2016, at 4:18 PM, Benoit Claise (bclaise) <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-07: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> -
> It seems to me that, when speaking of SPRING, people speaks of Segment
> Routing.
> The section title 3.3.1.2.2. is "SDN/SR use-case" btw.
> Why not mention it somewhere in the doc, for this first SPRING document?
> "SPRING is also known as Segment Routing"
> 
>