[spring] Packet Captures?

Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com> Fri, 06 March 2020 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew.alston@liquidtelecom.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288453A0C52 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 09:55:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1hskKgrW3mGJ for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 09:55:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-182.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-182.mimecast.com [207.82.80.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C63443A0C6B for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 09:55:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR04-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-vi1eur04lp2052.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.14.52]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-52-25_SQokbPRea6ARlUQA1zg-1; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:55:11 +0000
X-MC-Unique: 25_SQokbPRea6ARlUQA1zg-1
Received: from DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (20.179.47.79) by DBBPR03MB5429.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (20.179.47.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2793.11; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:55:09 +0000
Received: from DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::31cd:8171:1d1f:2fa9]) by DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::31cd:8171:1d1f:2fa9%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2772.019; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:55:09 +0000
From: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Packet Captures?
Thread-Index: AQHV8+BgMeCewbRSskqsNPlelEqiFA==
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:55:09 +0000
Message-ID: <2E727E08-3C2A-453A-A307-F75FBBFB47E8@liquidtelecom.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.21.0.200113
x-originating-ip: [2c0f:fe40:3:3:9129:5211:eff3:eec2]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0e5f5d1d-fa63-4787-6171-08d7c1f782f5
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DBBPR03MB5429:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DBBPR03MB54299A7B17C013E8DC3EEE1AEEE30@DBBPR03MB5429.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 0334223192
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(396003)(366004)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(199004)(189003)(316002)(71200400001)(66946007)(5660300002)(6512007)(478600001)(8936002)(2906002)(6486002)(66476007)(66556008)(91956017)(66446008)(6916009)(76116006)(6506007)(64756008)(36756003)(7116003)(2616005)(186003)(81156014)(3480700007)(33656002)(81166006)(86362001)(8676002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DBBPR03MB5429; H:DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: XnBe/WQlR1ZG/XiFoFg6MFNUZR4Fz2LeGFiLsfRMzVfUJiZkJxubUuUoLlVXrLuqIHPbqbwTUReXtCU/xn0+fX7Yiv6HG13h/o2/QUOoLCvyt0yU2xbD7Th/GY7s269ONuN5C18mu4rH3ynT5pk/TF47oq7G5O6eB7Z4LSGt2GHQjRKDdKPRa0ZsSx+SmPPv2ZtJdIKXjiWGzu6FMHnL15n+h153FZZXOBSbIHIKzAE/kK+KH+nSE5rEoUXCqcjFBbRPEu7WErlCojH70ykIKnXzik/4Qrz3iSYkrmE9V/PTrlMafffArdn6yqL9z3drHUD7Y5NzK3fvkXZEPcUXpv/O2TC0nt2b2NDZNmYNYp+CZYvQW/TVfHmq+YLO+CjaKp0nWKE9pR3B3XhX6a33DNuMRiskQGsZmIza+81Y7IrS888NMaQXKTYdQT6Ua0ve
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: T7/txIkUe/NQYCDYbnXEUZpu27SgVX7Othz3iOtRpimL6xe/pTe6H2my5rQ9G4UMDIDQlJqPthJKaVHExyRhlX/AiNnYq+j05dxamvCSZ382fSonTu+QfYfCagIudFa7SJTyaVnKCiXilWEKjNZyu3NkXHkd6jCQ7176PQmjBNc/XhZR4NmBSwzsD3GSAN48dI4ebsikl9uT6WlIzWGkaA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: liquidtelecom.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0e5f5d1d-fa63-4787-6171-08d7c1f782f5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Mar 2020 17:55:09.3567 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 68792612-0f0e-46cb-b16a-fcb82fd80cb1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: VqZmNhtrRKrMAxPbcI70y3OeqA/4I9dpm7PLI9LrMtvB493e7qLq1/FAfZFyhCz/8AEGhZUXSaPQY6hJ+8nqWCuveBK/UmxGft7S3y7qtwg=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DBBPR03MB5429
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: liquidtelecom.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2E727E083C2A453AA307F75FBBFB47E8liquidtelecomcom_"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/l8E3BsA9tlabOUNzrpTL1v_rGZQ>
Subject: [spring] Packet Captures?
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:55:25 -0000

Hi Guys,

I just wondered, since there are people on this list who are on the deployment draft – if anyone here has some packet captures from platforms that actually use the SRH.

In an effort to truly understand the behavior of the network programming draft and be able to comment in an informed manner, I’ve been doing a whole bunch of testing.  My problem is – with the boxes (in my case Cisco XR platforms of various flavors) – I am still unable on any code version I have to make them produce anything with an SRH header on it, and do my own compatibility checks and check my own packet generation against the draft – some actual production packet headers would be really useful.  (Any information about how to steer traffic in production XR code would also be welcomed – since I can’t seem to find anything in the code that does that – but I am figuring considering the deployment draft – someone on here must have ways to do this that I am missing)

Alternatively – is there anyone here who can tell me under what circumstances XR which is what I have to work with – will actually generate an SRH and use it – so that I can use that to generate my own packets.  Right now – even when creating vpn’s and using DT4 - I am seeing nothing more than effective iP tunneling (which I presume is as per section 4.7 of the draft)

Thanks

Andrew