IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Wed, 27 May 2020 11:20 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8FB3A0D81; Wed, 27 May 2020 04:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jx7mqabIo9X7; Wed, 27 May 2020 04:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:9e0:803::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AD533A0A80; Wed, 27 May 2020 04:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D0149; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:20:24 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:date:date:subject:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-type:message-id:from:from :received:received; s=mail; t=1590578422; bh=1SZ6X/tKLRx+cjYMl4d tDJjjfuIVXhiDkFnY+n4sVtQ=; b=af4DYhSNgxvx92Mwp7Ny2itaSEO+6tGZcYD 30L8CNgNQTuUdy1YCPkELnRQRQPSGQqrIyT0rmngRAe2ndW97O55R+MiycBD0gRc G3gBu623xHlbIRr/C8+I9XUY+4I+lM814MbBeN87fCar4ESJyosX/fcT3XAIf274 kzlQv7Mo=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id cNh2UbRJp4B0; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:20:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:9df5:37e3:414f:7eca] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:9df5:37e3:414f:7eca]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB2E53C; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:20:21 +0200 (CEST)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Message-Id: <557E6725-FB9A-4861-A5D3-1A1EE2244174@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0C9E2814-52F3-43D7-936A-5B7D0E7BE71D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 13:20:20 +0200
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB63864CBA7B0FF00BE5905A03E0B10@AM0PR07MB6386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>, Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
To: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
References: <C70B4EA4-5B92-498F-8D94-ABA3E70AFCA4@nokia.com> <AM0PR07MB63864CBA7B0FF00BE5905A03E0B10@AM0PR07MB6386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/r2xKtkqx6Y20mWcC4RMHDuOQkmU>
Subject: Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 11:20:31 -0000

Hi Gunter,

> A powerful property of RFC8663: No need for kernel access by applications

That assumes that there won't be an API at some point in the future. That's not a good argument against any protocol.

Cheers,
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email