Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt
li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com> Sat, 28 September 2019 15:15 UTC
Return-Path: <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CBC12004A; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.151
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.026, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pxp8fFBt6U4V; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092254092.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.254.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5438C12003E; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GjESqTJc3Clrz4VjYqrPGg6F7nxL97B7PUXBfl5J4pDle3rt115eMBFSc5HBBJ/AFyPBAKm1tyWWqzzFeYkmICxrVple1Bw1grxSqSQ/z5+xbuXXEwYpTEPEqVI6xmnwo2nqVktJqFrUIwwyEXVG0lUruqatHamuqwLmWqBfYB6aMbG9P4n0iQKW3rHUxvOJ7sjIl8UGE2sICF4IxmU1xF/IadBgn39DSFFpiropP8nTKmTFcplILBGL4ZuE4jmY91cOplbWPdxlKkKVOsL+CpaxV7zP3HUeLbFdd9zIj3JSyGFwCAM1yoPrvidMxUU5y3c9wMOA6E4G1oWgnYTUcw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5FAjNcWHMc8dY8AhGd2QUESThZu1A04bqnfVFOP0TiQ=; b=FLQYyND9x95685mExxm1XNExGRHvnJMy9KEWwsXEpYs3uwrQLGJ9gAiNOF/jF05Uvy4NlsAToakDub1VqNAsL5Jsgqc7LkXi1j3VwjvJSXuViBZANsOp6u4Xwsxbw+T8EI2bT9CcYNc5+bMR9UcdZSsVk1V/LcEa/U1dTDEj/hdFgV7MRX/MxrQWEODs5aOxw4unClgGX1UkOSomCzBsh/2R7iO5DMfzn4g2cNvNHvBws1yKEM6knpRL9C3+Atdu9z2JLokp/W9G0lJUU61jLW5/h+RX/fviiuGYBjVbBj1wPno6UXE7ofQv6LqirPFV8eoBNKCBMP/d2c+UnXbcyg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5FAjNcWHMc8dY8AhGd2QUESThZu1A04bqnfVFOP0TiQ=; b=QpSH3xzxgqbA+eMUabqUUAV3s3psIgfrxzPpWI3iNFL3q7J8PGrmXLdD9XAIu8hJIt+z18Y856UQ3aoGP3JJyVEUfT5W5ZLAqKP4EaU/MRWLTT1z1G71KW+KfeZPqL3Aoaqc8U4ToE47YgJvM//wcaSMKPhhZ/P6kQOOAKWCrAq0IbEJNXtjRy8lTV81RQfVKVi3MyO+R8MYwomfx4vnzZO2X1+6K7w2oxlur2Y/PBhz+a/Mfm60rx5TTFfJcvYvzCa567uznW7dn4yo+SqKZC4qeZglbT/CDqaxiLVOG/iYLWyLRTnCZ5zY5f/FEPTDgu3GzIonlueYzyF173o/gw==
Received: from PU1APC01FT015.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.252.53) by PU1APC01HT248.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.253.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.2305.15; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 15:15:06 +0000
Received: from HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.152.252.53) by PU1APC01FT015.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.252.227) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.2305.15 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 15:15:06 +0000
Received: from HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7dba:f7ea:56a0:2b70]) by HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7dba:f7ea:56a0:2b70%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2305.017; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 15:15:06 +0000
From: li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
CC: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt
Thread-Index: AQHVcwZCeK/vpugopEuxm97Kvltz5w==
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 15:15:06 +0000
Message-ID: <HK0PR03MB40661A3BC55E507916567364FC800@HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <156934935460.15603.11867492604510639688@ietfa.amsl.com>, <031BE952-7C37-4E4A-8F16-6038CB26C4A1@cisco.com>, <HK0PR03MB406608C49475C873C6EFA3A5FC810@HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>, <498DEE4B-0119-4A9B-98FC-BBD0579F1E58@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: HK2PR0401CA0019.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:202:2::29) To HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:203:9d::21)
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:F364F3BF1A649716E2B0F689B97F27D21C28A71A984B28030A9986635A7B0B4C; UpperCasedChecksum:58CBBD666A7C64AA621A11C771C888E643E69A38C849ECD48A351947FD26555F; SizeAsReceived:7906; Count:52
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-has-attach: no
x-mailer: Foxmail 7.2.9.156[cn]
x-tmn: [8LegS12RjKcbm4tdEn4CkWIz4K06LPLYq+OmJkG9yY4=]
x-microsoft-original-message-id: <201909282315031059009@hotmail.com>
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 52
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PU1APC01HT248:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: aNTIm2IU4WY5Z2QuhpIXRjDEY0L9AtFvEeibmseNAdn0r2PjRJlWL9gtq1EQfc1K4L8xkIY1kqvvDu1iQ1rc2a8J1auCMcV0k8n0jgJSaVYgwrVb8oX7eS1hgg5C9wMXJAIhE6ahrQJHuGUqKSax7oebovlbxXHR+v+trjM0liG08PuTDqaEz2zfSvrQ1+j1
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_HK0PR03MB40661A3BC55E507916567364FC800HK0PR03MB4066apcp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1b34eee5-cf1f-4921-78ec-08d74426a3fd
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Sep 2019 15:15:06.1659 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PU1APC01HT248
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/vU7PGlbcD9GW_LBKD7XOFZEmyAA>
Subject: Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 15:15:15 -0000
Hello Pablo, Without SRH insertion, PSP and USP are not needed. The example you give is decapsulation, not SRH pop. I can not imagine the scenario that will use PSP or USP without SRH insertion. We need illustration to keep them in the draft. Best Regards, Zhenqiang Li ________________________________ li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com From: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)<mailto:pcamaril@cisco.com> Date: 2019-09-27 19:13 To: li zhenqiang<mailto:li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>; spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>; ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> CC: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming<mailto:draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt Hi Zhenqiang, Can you clarify what is the issue with the PSP and USP flavors and how it is related to SRH insertion? For example USP flavor removes the SRH at the last segment (the final destination of the IP packet), before proceeding with the upper layer header processing. Cheers, Pablo. From: li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com> Date: Friday, 27 September 2019 at 10:41 To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt Hi Pablo and all, Thank the authors for their efforts and quick reponse to the discussion in the list. Since the SRH insertion parts are now removed from the base srv6 network programming draft, are the PSP and USP flavors appropriate to stay here? They do the SRH POP action. Best Regards, Zhenqiang Li ________________________________ li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com From: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)<mailto:pcamaril@cisco.com> Date: 2019-09-25 02:30 To: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> CC: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org> Subject: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt Hi all, We have just posted the split of SRv6 Network Programming. The SR endpoint and transit behaviors that perform SRH insertion are now under a new individual draft (draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-net-pgm-insertion). This revision does not contain any other update. As mentioned last week, throughout the rest of the week we will push another update with a few functional updates (e.g. NH=59). Thank you, Pablo (on behalf of the authors). -----Original Message----- From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org> Reply to: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org> Date: Tuesday, 24 September 2019 at 20:23 To: "i-d-announce@ietf.org" <i-d-announce@ietf.org> Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org> Subject: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking WG of the IETF. Title : SRv6 Network Programming Authors : Clarence Filsfils Pablo Camarillo Garvia John Leddy Daniel Voyer Satoru Matsushima Zhenbin Li Filename : draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt Pages : 42 Date : 2019-09-24 Abstract: This document describes the SRv6 network programming concept and its most basic functions. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
- [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-netwo… internet-drafts
- [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-n… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-sr… li zhenqiang
- Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-sr… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-sr… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-sr… li zhenqiang
- Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-sr… Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
- Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-sr… li zhenqiang
- Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-sr… Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
- Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-sr… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-sr… li zhenqiang
- Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-sr… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-sr… li zhenqiang
- Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-sr… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)