Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt

"Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)" <weibin.wang@nokia-sbell.com> Sun, 29 September 2019 00:36 UTC

Return-Path: <weibin.wang@nokia-sbell.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA78120115; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AFCLcjBpIHur; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnshjsmin03.alcatel-sbell.com.cn (cnshjsmin03.nokia-sbell.com [116.246.26.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5186A1200C7; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: ac189297-843ff7000001426c-e3-5d8ffc6c9135
Received: from CNSHPPEXCH1603.nsn-intra.net (Unknown_Domain [135.251.51.103]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by cnshjsmin03.alcatel-sbell.com.cn (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 54.14.17004.C6CFF8D5; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 08:35:56 +0800 (HKT)
Received: from CNSHPPEXCH1605.nsn-intra.net (135.251.51.105) by CNSHPPEXCH1603.nsn-intra.net (135.251.51.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 08:35:53 +0800
Received: from CNSHPPEXCH1605.nsn-intra.net ([135.251.51.105]) by CNSHPPEXCH1605.nsn-intra.net ([135.251.51.105]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.007; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 08:35:53 +0800
From: "Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)" <weibin.wang@nokia-sbell.com>
To: li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>, "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
CC: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt
Thread-Index: AQHVcwZHuPajcK5w7kyDna3/5tWK0adBz4rA
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 00:35:53 +0000
Message-ID: <d248c9e5841a4e0aba4e4aa613e1a8ba@nokia-sbell.com>
References: <156934935460.15603.11867492604510639688@ietfa.amsl.com>, <031BE952-7C37-4E4A-8F16-6038CB26C4A1@cisco.com>, <HK0PR03MB406608C49475C873C6EFA3A5FC810@HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>, <498DEE4B-0119-4A9B-98FC-BBD0579F1E58@cisco.com> <HK0PR03MB40661A3BC55E507916567364FC800@HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HK0PR03MB40661A3BC55E507916567364FC800@HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.251.51.115]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_d248c9e5841a4e0aba4e4aa613e1a8banokiasbellcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrFIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXS/ts4XTfnT3+sQedVFov5k7eyWrw8+57J Yv++9cwWv47vYrE4fuE3owOrx5TfG1k9HvecYfNYsuQnUwBzFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAldGz8HN zAVdW5krzp8/w9LAeGslcxcjB4eEgInE0+2aXYxcHEICx5kk9r7rY4Jw/jJKdE9fzALhbGKU mHfrClsXIycHm4CbxKRtu9hAEiICKxglJh6fxAQyilkgTeL2Nl0QU1ggVqJtvwtIuYhAnMT2 o1OYIWwjid/Xb4DZLAKqEmteXwfr5BWwkzixVQ9i1WUmiePLJjOB1HACjVnbeBCsnlFATOL7 qTVgcWYBcYlbT+aD2RICAhJL9pxnhrBFJV4+/scK8ZiSRN8GqPJUiRtLT7KA2LwCghInZz5h mcAoOgvJpFlIymYhKZsF9pemxPpd+hAlihJTuh+yQ9gaEq1z5rIjiy9gZF/FKJ2cV5yRVZyb mWdgrJeXn52ZqFuclJqTo5ecn7uJERijayQmTd/BeOyA9yFGAQ5GJR7eD7P6Y4VYE8uKK3MP MUpwMCuJ8PpG9sQK8aYkVlalFuXHF5XmpBYfYpTmYFES5/3d6hQrJJCeWJKanZpakFoEk2Xi 4JRqYLRcptfV53DMfvlDft3YpxOr40Xv1sZMLV04Sfnx3qpHrSU/99WwO64qDPM1/dKy8lbD x4K3nz1jjufX5+6admW2ZVbTf1aeJ9Nj9GtXSopbRBjlnE/rsXg4Z8U5gc3VpUm8xlsUTHVO LMx13mDHZqo0vWgKi/xLxrWqwf4bPCWrFIVavbqUlFiKMxINtZiLihMBRgM4680CAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/zp9thOLyZ8a3oAAH1mM1eAaFgvE>
Subject: Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 00:36:14 -0000

I think, If SRv6 domain ingress Node encapsulated new outer IPv6 header and inserted SRH simultaneously on Packets entering the SRv6 domain, when the packet reach penultimate or egress Node, the PSP and USP may be invoked;  another example, if packet which is originated or destined to Nodes within SRv6 domain, and the SRH inserted at originated at source represent a TE-path within SRv6 domain, the PSP and USP May also be used, such as CLI Ping command.

--------------------------------------
Cheers !


WANG Weibin

From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of li zhenqiang
Sent: 2019年9月28日 23:15
To: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) <pcamaril@cisco.com>; spring@ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt

Hello Pablo,

Without SRH insertion, PSP and USP are not needed. The example you give is decapsulation, not SRH pop.
I can not imagine the scenario that will use PSP or USP without SRH insertion. We need illustration to keep them in the draft.

Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
________________________________
li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com<mailto:li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>

From: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)<mailto:pcamaril@cisco.com>
Date: 2019-09-27 19:13
To: li zhenqiang<mailto:li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>; spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>; ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
CC: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming<mailto:draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt
Hi Zhenqiang,

Can you clarify what is the issue with the PSP and USP flavors and how it is related to SRH insertion?

For example USP flavor removes the SRH at the last segment (the final destination of the IP packet), before proceeding with the upper layer header processing.

Cheers,
Pablo.

From: li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com<mailto:li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>>
Date: Friday, 27 September 2019 at 10:41
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com<mailto:pcamaril@cisco.com>>, "spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>" <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>, "ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>" <ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>>
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt

Hi Pablo and all,

Thank the authors for their efforts and quick reponse to the discussion in the list.
Since the SRH insertion parts are now removed from the base srv6 network programming draft, are the PSP and USP flavors appropriate to stay here? They do the SRH POP action.

Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
________________________________
li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com<mailto:li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>

From: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)<mailto:pcamaril@cisco.com>
Date: 2019-09-25 02:30
To: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
CC: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>
Subject: [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt
Hi all,

We have just posted the split of SRv6 Network Programming.
The SR endpoint and transit behaviors that perform SRH insertion are now under a new individual draft (draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-net-pgm-insertion). This revision does not contain any other update.

As mentioned last week, throughout the rest of the week we will push another update with a few functional updates (e.g. NH=59).

Thank you,
Pablo (on behalf of the authors).


-----Original Message-----
From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of "internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>" <internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>
Reply to: "spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>" <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Date: Tuesday, 24 September 2019 at 20:23
To: "i-d-announce@ietf.org<mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>" <i-d-announce@ietf.org<mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>>
Cc: "spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>" <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt


    A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
    This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking WG of the IETF.

            Title           : SRv6 Network Programming
            Authors         : Clarence Filsfils
                              Pablo Camarillo Garvia
                              John Leddy
                              Daniel Voyer
                              Satoru Matsushima
                              Zhenbin Li
    Filename        : draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03.txt
    Pages           : 42
    Date            : 2019-09-24

    Abstract:
       This document describes the SRv6 network programming concept and its
       most basic functions.



    The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming/

    There are also htmlized versions available at:
    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03

    A diff from the previous version is available at:
    https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-03


    Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
    until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

    Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
    ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

    _______________________________________________
    spring mailing list
    spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring


_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring