[spring] some comments to draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming-05
Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Thu, 16 August 2018 22:42 UTC
Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55C9130F32; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 15:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WxeuA-ku4bZh; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 15:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39FAB130F2C; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 15:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 9AF46ADB713D5; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 23:42:15 +0100 (IST)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.399.0; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 23:42:16 +0100
Received: from SJCEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.107]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.45]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 15:42:11 -0700
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org" <draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>, "Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: some comments to draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming-05
Thread-Index: AdQ1r/DFdZasIR5lToe1OdWTBRgS1Q==
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 22:42:11 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B0DC466@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.118]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B0DC466sjceml521mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/yWyRacseG2syee6Edj6qI176bFg>
Subject: [spring] some comments to draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming-05
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 22:42:21 -0000
Clarence, et al, Does your draft cover the scenario of a node "N" in Section 5 (Transit Behavior) belonging to a different administrative domain? Section 7 is on Intra Domain deployment Basic Security, will you consider "Inter Domain" basic security? I assume that "SEC 1", "SEC 2" etc. are meant for Identifying "Basic Security". Can you use a "SEC-1", or "SEC-REQ-1", etc. to make it easier for cross reference from other documents? Thanks, Linda Dunbar
- [spring] some comments to draft-filsfils-spring-s… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [spring] some comments to draft-filsfils-spri… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)