IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] some comments to draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming-05

"Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com> Tue, 21 August 2018 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <pcamaril@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF4A130E60; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bm-UOeklMowL; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E3C4130DE0; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11604; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1534884306; x=1536093906; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=VbQ8JYcsd4TBN3g41ve4pjpHKxOaiDPSNPrCRgAkXag=; b=CBbyeXNLIqRuHAhsUA6jGanGTLIyicvYHIZ3ywC12FUa/QVpWqePkEYk Zfuxk08yJIrJRGILF7kiNJL2PnRye8oVTbqnc8kj45dWIou35z3x4T3Ci Cg9LMHJMQtiaGzh8BUhqhfLYopHBf6/q3/h6JYOWGbc5dr72D9fqN81xV U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C0AAB0eHxb/5RdJa1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJXeGR/KAqDJz+IDIwigg2QcIUsgXoLhGwCF4MBITQYAQIBAQIBAQJtKIU3AQEBBAwXZgIBBgIRAwECKwICAjAdCAEBBAESgyIBgR1kiXWbS4EuimaJGBeBQT+BOR+CTIUegmExgiYCiHaEBoVMiD0JAo9hFYE+hC+ITJMMAhEUgSQdOIFScBVlAYI+CZBKbwGOL4EbAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,271,1531785600"; d="scan'208,217";a="160895475"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Aug 2018 20:45:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w7LKj3kC004561 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:45:04 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 15:45:02 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 15:45:02 -0500
From: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org" <draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>, "Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: some comments to draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming-05
Thread-Index: AdQ1r/DFdZasIR5lToe1OdWTBRgS1QEGo+QA
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:45:02 +0000
Message-ID: <FDF543B2-E002-496E-9D89-ADBBC219F91F@cisco.com>
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B0DC466@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B0DC466@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.104.65]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FDF543B2E002496E9D89ADBBC219F91Fciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/m1qMCLaZ9kbN8BMKIc8x7R6x0iM>
Subject: Re: [spring] some comments to draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming-05
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:45:09 -0000

Hi Linda,

Please see inline.

Thanks,
Pablo.

From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
Date: Friday, 17 August 2018 at 00:42
To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org" <draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>, Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
Subject: some comments to draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming-05
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
Resent-To: <cf@cisco.com>, <pcamaril@cisco.com>, <john_leddy@cable.comcast.com>, <daniel.voyer@bell.ca>, <satoru.matsushima@g.softbank.co.jp>, <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
Resent-Date: Friday, 17 August 2018 at 00:42


Clarence, et al,

Does your draft cover the scenario of a node “N”  in Section 5 (Transit Behavior) belonging to a different administrative domain?
PC: Draft assumes that nodes are within a multi-domain network managed within a single administrative domain.

Section 7 is on Intra Domain deployment Basic Security, will you consider “Inter Domain” basic security?
PC: Inter-domain security will be described in a companion document. Network programming only covers intra-domain security.

I assume that “SEC 1”, “SEC 2” etc. are meant for Identifying “Basic Security”. Can you use a “SEC-1”, or “SEC-REQ-1”, etc. to make it easier for cross reference from other documents?
PC: Sure. We’ll use SEC-1, SEC-2 and so on in the next version of the draft.

Thanks, Linda Dunbar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email