Re: Point of order re: Internet Security Guidelines I-D
Stephen D Crocker <crocker@tis.com> Tue, 25 June 1991 08:45 UTC
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01814; 25 Jun 91 4:45 EDT
Received: from TIS.COM by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01781; 25 Jun 91 4:37 EDT
Received: from TIS.COM by TIS.COM (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA04944; Tue, 25 Jun 91 02:54:55 EDT
Message-Id: <9106250654.AA04944@TIS.COM>
To: Craig Partridge <craig@sics.se>
Cc: spwg@NRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Point of order re: Internet Security Guidelines I-D
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 25 Jun 91 08:25:40 +0200. <9106250625.AA26851@garuda.sics.se>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1991 02:54:53 -0400
From: Stephen D Crocker <crocker@tis.com>
Craig, Your point is well made and I agree. It's inappropriate to require conformance if there isn't a legitimate job of informing the users. Now the trick is to craft the wording the right way. This is intended to be an enabling document. It's supposed to stimulate network and host administrators into writing policies which are consistent with these guidelines. Thanks, Steve
- Point of order re: Internet Security Guidelines I… Stephen D Crocker
- Re: Point of order re: Internet Security Guidelin… Stephen D Crocker
- re: Point of order re: Internet Security Guidelin… Craig Partridge
- Re: Point of order re: Internet Security Guidelin… matsb
- Re: Point of order re: Internet Security Guidelin… Stephen D Crocker