Re: Draft Security Policy

Steven Blair <sblair@synoptics.com> Thu, 18 October 1990 17:39 UTC

Received: from cert.sei.cmu.edu by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07562; 18 Oct 90 13:39 EDT
Received: from NRI.RESTON.VA.US by cert.sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.2) id AA02228; Thu, 18 Oct 90 12:51:11 -0400
Received: from mvis1.synoptics.com by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05624; 18 Oct 90 11:28 EDT
Received: from excalibur.synoptics.com by mvis1.synoptics.com (5.61/2.1G) id AA00773; Thu, 18 Oct 90 08:28:53 -0700
Received: by excalibur.synoptics.com (4.0/2.0N) id AA01847; Thu, 18 Oct 90 08:28:51 PDT
Message-Id: <9010181528.AA01847@excalibur.synoptics.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 1990 08:28:51 -0700
From: Steven Blair <sblair@synoptics.com>
Quote-Week: Die Yuppie Scum II...the next paycheck..
To: postel@venera.isi.edu, ssphwg@NRI.Reston.VA.US, vancleef@prandtl.nas.nasa.gov
Subject: Re: Draft Security Policy
Cc: psrg-interest@venera.isi.edu, spwg@NRI.Reston.VA.USd
Status: O

OK, I now understand the wording issues that many have been so kind
to email me this morning. I agree that accidental, Morris et. al. is
relative. But the other wordings are what I have more issues with,
which is why I suggested a re-wording

Comments??

scb