Re: [Srcomp] Compression proposals

[Weiqiang Cheng <[e-mail]>]

Hi Ron,

When we discuss the priority of the items at early of last September, we set
the item and some other security items as lower priority. 

I think we can go through it in our meetings.

 

B.R.

Weiqiang Cheng

 

发件人: Srcomp [mailto:[e-mail]] 代表 Ron Bonica
发送时间: 2021年1月26日 03:19
收件人: Ron Bonica; Darren Dukes (ddukes); Chengli (Cheng Li); James
Guichard; [e-mail]
主题: Re: [Srcomp] Compression proposals

 

Folks,

 

The last mention of it is in an excel spread sheet attached to the 8-19
minutes. We appear to have approved it.

 

                                                   Ron

 

 

Juniper Business Use Only

From: Srcomp <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Ron Bonica
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 2:15 PM
To: Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddukes=[e-mail]>; Chengli
(Cheng Li) <[e-mail]>; James Guichard
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Srcomp] Compression proposals

 

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

 

Folks,

 

This reminds me. What happened to REQ-7-24-ipv6-based? Was that dropped
unintentionally?

 

                                                             Ron

 

 

Juniper Business Use Only

From: Ron Bonica 
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 2:11 PM
To: Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddukes=[e-mail]>; Chengli
(Cheng Li) <[e-mail]>; James Guichard
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Compression proposals

 

Folks,

 

Is RFC 8663 really a compression proposal? It requires all of the segment
endpoints to be MPLS aware?

 

 
Ron

 

 

 

Juniper Business Use Only

From: Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddukes=[e-mail]> 
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 1:04 PM
To: Chengli (Cheng Li) <[e-mail]>; James Guichard
<[e-mail]>; Ron Bonica <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail]
Subject: Re: Compression proposals

 

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

 

Here is my summary of drafts for reading and analysis:

 

draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-comp-sl-enc

・         Documents SRv6 SID behaviors to support  compression, combining
SIDs from:

o    draft-filsfils-spring-net-pgm-extension-srv6-usid (SRv6 uSID)

o    draft-cl-spring-generalized-srv6-np (SRv6 GSID)

 

draft-decraene-spring-srv6-vlsid

・         Documents a new or modified routing header for compression and
how to build SRv6 SIDs

 

draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr

・         Documents new routing headers and a label map to IPv6 address and
behavior 

 

draft-mirsky-6man-unified-id-sr

・         Documents a new or modified routing header with variable length
segments and a label map to IPv6 address and behavior

 

RFC8663

・         Documents SR MPLS over IP(v6), a label mapped to IPv6 address and
behavior.

 

Darren

 

 

On 2021-01-21, 10:33 PM, "Srcomp" <[e-mail]> wrote:

 

Hi Jim,

 

Many thanks for your information! However, the second draft defines the
architecture of G-SRv6, while the first draft defines the G-SRv6 for
compression as we can see it from the name of the drafts. Therefore, they
are a single solution.

 

Also, the third draft describes three types of solutions including G-SRv6,
Micro SID and combination. Therefore, they are mainly two proposals in the
links you proposed: G-SRv6 and Micro Segment.

 

In summary, we already have multiple proposals as listed below:

・         G-SRv6 (One option in native SRv6 compression)

・         Micro SID(One option in native SRv6 compression)

・         V-SID(draft-decraene-spring-srv6-vlsid)

・         CRH(draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr)

・         U-SID (draft-mirsky-6man-unified-id-sr)

 

Thanks,

Cheng

 

 

From: Srcomp [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 2:25 AM
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Srcomp] Compression proposals

 

Hi Ron,

 

There are several.

 

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cl-spring-generalized-srv6-for-cmpr-02
.txt
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cl-spring-
generalized-srv6-for-cmpr-02.txt__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!XQz6gvaf5fLsl1-HAyZF3mOPOTl
2UN_a4ydV2oh6O6xNGbyyMoRZd0ULCD4E2xnW$> 

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cl-spring-generalized-srv6-np-02.txt
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cl-spring-
generalized-srv6-np-02.txt__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!XQz6gvaf5fLsl1-HAyZF3mOPOTl2UN_a4
ydV2oh6O6xNGbyyMoRZd0ULCEP-jEq5$> 

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-comp-sl-
enc-02.txt
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-filsfilsch
eng-spring-srv6-srh-comp-sl-enc-02.txt__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!XQz6gvaf5fLsl1-HAyZF3
mOPOTl2UN_a4ydV2oh6O6xNGbyyMoRZd0ULCEVZ0xVo$> 

 

Jim

From: Srcomp <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Ron Bonica
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 10:03 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [Srcomp] Compression proposals

 

Folks,

 

The following are a few compression proposals:

 

-          draft-decraene-spring-srv6-vlsid

-          draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr

-          draft-mirsky-6man-unified-id-sr

-          draft-filsfils-spring-net-pgm-extension-srv6-usid

 

Can anybody think of any others.

 

                                              Ron

 

 

Juniper Business Use Only