IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Srcomp] Compression proposals

"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com> Fri, 22 January 2021 03:33 UTC

Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8CB3A0A2E for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 19:33:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ZuM10p5DX_B for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 19:33:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 039603A0A34 for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 19:33:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml706-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DMPsJ4nZKz67dg7 for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:30:12 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.55) by fraeml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2106.2; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 04:33:23 +0100
Received: from DGGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.39) by fraeml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.2106.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 04:33:23 +0100
Received: from DGGEML529-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.110]) by DGGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::b177:a243:7a69:5ab8%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0509.000; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:33:19 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>
To: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "srcomp@ietf.org" <srcomp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Compression proposals
Thread-Index: AdbvROo6uYfqFjp2Q8uIc1LbkBl36QAFDBUAAEU9VNA=
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 03:33:18 +0000
Message-ID: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02DCF57C@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <DM6PR05MB63489BCA51725044568009DBAEA29@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB4206631CABE6F8F34032C892D2A29@MN2PR13MB4206.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR13MB4206631CABE6F8F34032C892D2A29@MN2PR13MB4206.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.130]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02DCF57Cdggeml529mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srcomp/truMXdTlbSEcgmKf3FwhKZvcnfs>
Subject: Re: [Srcomp] Compression proposals
X-BeenThere: srcomp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <srcomp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/>
List-Post: <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 03:33:29 -0000

Hi Jim,

Many thanks for your information! However, the second draft defines the architecture of G-SRv6, while the first draft defines the G-SRv6 for compression as we can see it from the name of the drafts. Therefore, they are a single solution.

Also, the third draft describes three types of solutions including G-SRv6, Micro SID and combination. Therefore, they are mainly two proposals in the links you proposed: G-SRv6 and Micro Segment.

In summary, we already have multiple proposals as listed below:

*         G-SRv6 (One option in native SRv6 compression)

*         Micro SID(One option in native SRv6 compression)

  *   V-SID(draft-decraene-spring-srv6-vlsid)

*         CRH(draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr)

  *   U-SID (draft-mirsky-6man-unified-id-sr)

Thanks,
Cheng


From: Srcomp [mailto:srcomp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 2:25 AM
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>; srcomp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Srcomp] Compression proposals

Hi Ron,

There are several.

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cl-spring-generalized-srv6-for-cmpr-02.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cl-spring-generalized-srv6-np-02.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-comp-sl-enc-02.txt

Jim
From: Srcomp <srcomp-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:srcomp-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Ron Bonica
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 10:03 AM
To: srcomp@ietf.org<mailto:srcomp@ietf.org>
Subject: [Srcomp] Compression proposals

Folks,

The following are a few compression proposals:

-          draft-decraene-spring-srv6-vlsid
-          draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr
-          draft-mirsky-6man-unified-id-sr
-          draft-filsfils-spring-net-pgm-extension-srv6-usid

Can anybody think of any others.

                                              Ron



Juniper Business Use Only

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email