[Srcomp] Could we have a sync-up meeting to address the comments?
Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Sun, 26 September 2021 01:32 UTC
Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B353A11DC for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 18:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R-pyWvMpnfhX for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 18:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98C83A11DD for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 18:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.19]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app07-12007 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee7614fcd86ab9-c79bb; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 09:31:52 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee7614fcd86ab9-c79bb
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc (unknown[10.1.6.6]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr10-12010 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eea614fcd85256-933f0; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 09:31:52 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2eea614fcd85256-933f0
From: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: 'srcomp' <srcomp@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 09:31:49 +0800
Message-ID: <06ad01d7b276$47a2dde0$d6e899a0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_06AE_01D7B2B9.55C61DE0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdeydebaSoKw6RDtQJyYY/RJhQ0r0w==
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srcomp/MylzRQCuRBXbhemPdEJV1K4D0Xs>
Subject: [Srcomp] Could we have a sync-up meeting to address the comments?
X-BeenThere: srcomp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Compressed SRv6 SID Design Team <srcomp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/>
List-Post: <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 01:32:22 -0000
Hi Co-authors, The requirement and analysis drafts have been adopted by SPRING. It is great achievement of the design team. There are quite a few comments for the both drafts, and we should address them. Could we have a sync-up meeting? If possible, I hope to use the Wednesday slot as usual. Let me know your idea. B.R. Weiqiang Cheng
- [Srcomp] Could we have a sync-up meeting to addre… Weiqiang Cheng
- Re: [Srcomp] Could we have a sync-up meeting to a… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [Srcomp] Could we have a sync-up meeting to a… Ron Bonica
- Re: [Srcomp] Could we have a sync-up meeting to a… peng.shaofu
- Re: [Srcomp] Could we have a sync-up meeting to a… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [Srcomp] Could we have a sync-up meeting to a… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- [Srcomp] 答复: Could we have a sync-up meeting to a… Weiqiang Cheng