Re: [Srcomp] Could we have a sync-up meeting to address the comments?

"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com> Sun, 26 September 2021 10:24 UTC

Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A363A1DD0 for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 03:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.328
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.328 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=0.568, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E6M95I6DBzLy for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 03:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1B273A1DCD for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 03:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml706-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4HHMHl03yYz67vRn for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 18:21:23 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemm500004.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.219) by fraeml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.8; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 12:23:53 +0200
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.56) by dggpemm500004.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 18:23:51 +0800
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) by dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.008; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 18:23:51 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>
To: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>, 'srcomp' <srcomp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Srcomp] Could we have a sync-up meeting to address the comments?
Thread-Index: AdeydebaSoKw6RDtQJyYY/RJhQ0r0wASrKoI
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 10:23:51 +0000
Message-ID: 4AFAB0A0-1CA6-4F84-BD05-5F32F780450D
References: <06ad01d7b276$47a2dde0$d6e899a0$@com>
In-Reply-To: <06ad01d7b276$47a2dde0$d6e899a0$@com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4AFAB0A01CA64F84BD055F32F780450D_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srcomp/umqb04wQvtjwp5V0TeZjdiK4fBQ>
Subject: Re: [Srcomp] Could we have a sync-up meeting to address the comments?
X-BeenThere: srcomp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Compressed SRv6 SID Design Team <srcomp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/>
List-Post: <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 10:24:02 -0000

Yes I can




________________________________

李呈 Li Cheng
Mobile: +86-15116983550<tel:+86-15116983550>
Email: c.l@huawei.com<mailto:c.l@huawei.com>
发件人:Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
收件人:'srcomp' <srcomp@ietf.org>
时 间:2021-09-26 09:32:33
主 题:[Srcomp] Could we have a sync-up meeting to address the comments?

Hi Co-authors,

The requirement and analysis drafts have been adopted by SPRING. It is great achievement of the design team.

There are quite a few comments for the both drafts, and we should address them.

Could we have a sync-up meeting?

If possible, I hope to use the Wednesday slot as usual. Let me know your idea.

B.R.
Weiqiang Cheng