[Stackevo] an agenda for Wednesday's meeting

"Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch> Mon, 25 March 2019 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B99B120413 for <stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ISr0yJBfaT1t for <stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-sh2.infomaniak.ch (smtp-sh2.infomaniak.ch [128.65.195.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD030120442 for <stackevo@iab.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:04:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp6.infomaniak.ch (smtp6.infomaniak.ch [83.166.132.19]) by smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x2PE4A0F030630 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for <stackevo@iab.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:04:10 +0100
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:9c9d:200:27a8:68c3] ([IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:9c9d:200:27a8:68c3]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp6.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x2PE4AXi048484 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <stackevo@iab.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:04:10 +0100
From: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Message-Id: <6C66F810-1168-42C3-B4B5-CBBABBE60349@trammell.ch>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:04:09 +0100
To: Stackevo <stackevo@iab.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Unix mail servers drweb plugin ver.6.0.2.8
X-Antivirus-Code: 0x100000
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stackevo/3FB5OSn4PXsoOTkA9xwdU8ne8Z0>
Subject: [Stackevo] an agenda for Wednesday's meeting
X-BeenThere: stackevo@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Stack Evolution Program Mailing List <stackevo.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/stackevo>, <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stackevo/>
List-Post: <mailto:stackevo@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo>, <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:04:20 -0000

Greetings, all,

From discussions with the IAB and in the hallway in Prague, I'd propose a few topics of discussion for our meeting on Wednesday (13:20 in Herkovcka, mezzanine level)

(1) next/final steps on draft-thomson-use-it-or-lose-it: we'd like to get this draft ready to send up to the IAB for adoption soon.

(2) next/(final) steps for the Stack Evolution Program: what else do we want to do after finishing use-it-or-lose-it? 

This is my now-traditional annual attempt to declare victory and close the program.

(3) Following up on a question Aaron posed in the hallway: 

"To what extent is compute a part of the current Internet architecture, and to what extent are we poorly served by not treating it as such?". This is possibly a less intractable rephrasing of the "what is an endpoint?" question. The end-to-end model we use for the Internet really only applies up to a front-end load balancer for an increasing proportion of Internet traffic. To borrow a phrase from the past, everything on the other side of that LB is a catanet, albeit one that still kinda-mostly runs some transport/application stack atop IP.

What implications does this development (which has basically already happened with the migration of everything on the server-side not already on a CDN into one or more public clouds) have for the evolution of the stack and the architecture?

We could probably spend unbounded time on the question above; I'd like to know if anyone has other questions to address?

Thanks, cheers,

Brian