Re: [Stackevo] Agenda for Friday's IP Stack Evolution meeting

Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net> Tue, 22 July 2014 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <nordmark@sonic.net>
X-Original-To: stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C0C1ABB90 for <stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LpOhKdL61J_u for <stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F06F1A0377 for <stackevo@iab.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.22.239.71] ([162.210.130.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s6MJGG3k022552 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:16:17 -0700
Message-ID: <53CEB880.20000@sonic.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:16:16 -0700
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
References: <A9FC728E-64FD-4311-9A9C-C7DA743FEAF8@trammell.ch> <53CEB125.9060106@sonic.net> <71AB9653-CCC9-4FB0-B122-A604E1A179AA@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <71AB9653-CCC9-4FB0-B122-A604E1A179AA@trammell.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sonic-ID: C;So4xp9QR5BGUiE2zUc16mQ== M;pCh+p9QR5BGUiE2zUc16mQ==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stackevo/zJvh_uwTFTkPm4cGFMZ87PMFbKQ
Cc: stackevo@iab.org
Subject: Re: [Stackevo] Agenda for Friday's IP Stack Evolution meeting
X-BeenThere: stackevo@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Stack Evolution Program Mailing List <stackevo.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/stackevo>, <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/stackevo/>
List-Post: <mailto:stackevo@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo>, <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:16:23 -0000

On 7/22/14, 11:57 AM, Brian Trammell wrote:
> hi Erik,
>
> Good point. I wasn't around for that part of the TSVWG agenda today; how was it received in tsvwg?

It was well received. I *think* it was accepted as a WG document. It is 
a -00 thus it might need some work to polish it. It is intended to be 
high-level, but looking briefly at the document we might even want a 
higher level IAB document.

     Erik

>
> Cheers,
>
> Brian
>
> On 22 Jul 2014, at 14:44, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net> wrote:
>
>> The program might want to consider a statement around the benefits of enabling ECN.
>> There is a new draft (briefly presented in TSVWG) - draft-welzl-ecn-benefits.
>>
>> If we want to raise awareness of the benefits of ECN we should consider something like that as an IAB document to give it higher weight.
>>
>>    Erik
>>
>> On 7/21/14, 8:34 AM, Brian Trammell wrote:
>>> Greetings, all,
>>>
>>> The IP Stack Evolution program will have its first (post-reboot) meeting at 07:30 - 08:55 EDT in the York room.
>>>
>>> On the draft agenda:
>>>
>>>
>>> (1) Quick review of Friday's UDP35 meeting (Brian)
>>>
>>> (2) Quick review of Monday's TAPS BoF (Brian, Michael)
>>>
>>> (3) Discussion of initial documents:
>>>
>>> (3a) Guidance and reflections on running the Internet over Port 443 (Marc)
>>>
>>> (3b) Guidance for the creation of new transport protocols over IDP (Jana)
>>>
>>> (4) Moving toward a minimal common transport (SPUD requirements) (Joe)
>>>
>>> (5) Other action items / schedule next meeting/call
>>>
>>>
>>> Names next to agenda items means "please be prepared to talk", not "please send slideware" :)
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>> Thanks, cheers,
>>>
>>> Brian
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Stackevo mailing list
>>> Stackevo@iab.org
>>> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Stackevo mailing list
>> Stackevo@iab.org
>> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo
> _______________________________________________
> Stackevo mailing list
> Stackevo@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo
>