Re: [stir] draft-kaplan-stir-ikes-out

["Anton Tveretin" <[e-mail]>]

Hello,
First, I thank you, Hadriel, for the work done.
See my notes, though.
Why should addresses be included into IKES? IMO that adds nothing but extra 
work
for each validator.
Chapter 11 (error): in DSS1, call termination is done with 3 messages
(DISCONNECT/RELEASE/RELEASE COMPLETE). In H.225.0 call control, just one
(RELEASE COMPLETE). This error must be corrected.
H.225.0 call control contains h323-uu-pdu, which coexists with 
user-information, and thus it actually does not count to 131 bytes of ISDN 
User-to-User IE. So I think it is possible to combine all ISDN (ISUP, DSS1, 
H.225.0 CC).
But, for H.323 it would be more critical to supply IKES in RAS (e.g. ARQ) 
and H.501 messages IMO.
Yes, H.323 Forum might have a different opinion about H.323 dying. Anyway, 
H.323 users deserve new features, practice shows that.
And what about other networks, e.g. GSM?
Sincerely yours,
Anton.