IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] Constraining count

"Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> Fri, 14 April 2017 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=92774589c6=jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C9D126C23 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=neustar.biz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FP2oUYlT4NFF for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F9A126BF0 for <stir@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049401.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v3EGNOXD023359; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:32:11 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neustar.biz; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=neustar-biz; bh=HHihiSUijxdWDS1p9Rr/ch7OFhE1fx/hwObkqHimJdI=; b=ijR3O9FQGo5hmljAeBXiMt9WSoPsX2GGkqS5KrdmLBr8G+KLFkg7uu4WJg/kGlVzUBd9 Nw5Z+g5K8ASVtQmE4Ep9uwd0ke3e19LFJUzjplK1rK6U479XvliYUvX7pTW3PSxkzxgu xqmrg/QfGVU065PHD9mXHtoXp6us6Nnb3KBhFJ8UdrmUolMgncZP/12TV4G4PeLETAmw kjJpPs9+9jfMe9p6khKWXBNRKV9lzEnKgxO87xj2bc6UGneFV6PDSLc6+ssK7W1iLjse vd9wpLEYPH+M1Z4dT7wPOtWPMDBGtRMCipWz1OXwjPBDczH2/PUs0wdVNPz46C4t/NE0 Hg==
Received: from stntexhc10.cis.neustar.com ([156.154.17.216]) by mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 29sxr2j9y4-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:32:11 -0400
Received: from STNTEXMB10.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.5.33]) by stntexhc10.cis.neustar.com ([10.31.58.69]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:32:10 -0400
From: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
CC: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [stir] Constraining count
Thread-Index: AQHSs+Aryo19vvMLHkSAllZ432okLqHDlAUAgAF9jYA=
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 16:32:10 +0000
Message-ID: <D51671AF.1D8965%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
References: <A956D446-A375-422A-88E0-69F4AF7E0821@sn3rd.com> <7E0D6FF6-1E8B-40D2-8014-A8D21687ED78@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <7E0D6FF6-1E8B-40D2-8014-A8D21687ED78@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.3.160329
x-originating-ip: [10.96.13.31]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <1FD67ABBE41DB5498F22A4B8BBA630A2@neustar.biz>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-04-14_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1702020001 definitions=main-1704140141
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/q_jOfqGDt2Cek2pIdgWIzAjkJM8>
Subject: Re: [stir] Constraining count
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 16:32:16 -0000

If you two are happy with this one, I'm happy.

Jon Peterson
Neustar, Inc.

On 4/13/17, 9:46 AM, "stir on behalf of Russ Housley"
<stir-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

>I support his change.  It eliminates the ambiguity that range could be
>used with a count of one.
>
>Russ
>
>
>> On Apr 12, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
>> 
>> In one of the threads Russ suggested that we constrain the number of
>>TNs in a range to be greater than two.  I haven¹t seen much discussion
>>on this so I went ahead and created an issue:
>>  https://github.com/stirwg/certificates/issues/3
>> and a PR to address the issue:
>>  https://github.com/stirwg/certificates/pull/6/files
>> 
>> What do people think?  Personally, this change makes sense to me; it¹s
>>providing instructions to the compiler with no bits-on-the-wire changes.
>> 
>> spt
>> _______________________________________________
>> stir mailing list
>> stir@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir
>
>_______________________________________________
>stir mailing list
>stir@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email