Re: [Stox] Review of -chat

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 30 July 2013 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3A321F999D for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.290, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0u627QDLNY6x for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62AE21F999E for <stox@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ergon.local (unknown [198.135.0.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8FB14010C; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:08:26 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <51F7D664.3050305@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:06:12 +0200
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
References: <7F5BB54B-0650-42BA-A599-C5DBBB6326D4@ag-projects.com> <96A5E265-F3BB-4ED6-9D76-19AFC984C93A@ag-projects.com> <51F7C91C.6070508@ericsson.com> <51F7D5C1.6010200@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <51F7D5C1.6010200@stpeter.im>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: stox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] Review of -chat
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:06:44 -0000

On 7/30/13 5:03 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 7/30/13 4:09 PM, Salvatore Loreto wrote:
>> On 7/30/13 4:06 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
>>> One more thing: the -chat document doesn't have the detailed DNS
>>> lookup mechanism description that the IM document does, I guess it
>>> should also contain it, right?
>> I would prefer not to duplicate the same text among the different documents
>> unless there is not some specific DNS lookup detail that is specific for
>> chat. Is this the case?
>>
>> we can maybe think if the right place for the DNS lookup mechanism is IM
>> document or we want to have it
>> in the Core draft
> 
> As I recall, we already discussed the topic, starting here:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox/current/msg00069.html
> 
> I think we *might* be able to provide some informational guidance, but I
> don't know how strong it can be.

But, if we do have text, I think it belongs in stox-core.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/