IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stox] stox-presence-03: a couple of comments

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 06 September 2013 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4E111E80EC for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 08:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.029
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQCWoCalU9Q6 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 08:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3066F21F9B80 for <stox@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 08:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ergon.local (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81DCC414D0; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:33:12 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <5229F4BA.8020706@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:28:58 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com
References: <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7620A08FEFE@008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com> <521BDB79.9080809@stpeter.im> <52292BFD.7070207@stpeter.im> <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7620A099FC6@008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7620A099FC6@008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: stox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] stox-presence-03: a couple of comments
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:29:08 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/6/13 7:26 AM, Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> OK. I do recall too that the intent was to put all DNS handling to
> -core and that has now happened. Thanks, it makes things clearer as
> there is less overlap between the documents.

I just realized that last night I pushed out a corrected version of
the -im spec with DNS text still in there. I'll submit a revised I-D.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=qyTS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email