IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stox] [dispatch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-im-03.txt

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 06 May 2013 02:23 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28F021F8A6B for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 May 2013 19:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.68
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.251, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7uDMjlHXMszN for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 May 2013 19:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBEB21F8A48 for <stox@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 May 2013 19:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ergon.local (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D477640035; Sun, 5 May 2013 20:34:47 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <51871414.70504@stpeter.im>
Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 20:23:16 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com>
References: <20130405023718.11095.85523.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <515E391A.3030800@stpeter.im> <EDB618A5-C6D0-470F-8357-758EBA9C0F15@ag-projects.com> <51841069.7030008@stpeter.im> <5C0D4541-66B5-4126-805A-9AD9D27D2188@ag-projects.com>
In-Reply-To: <5C0D4541-66B5-4126-805A-9AD9D27D2188@ag-projects.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: stox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] [dispatch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-im-03.txt
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 02:23:24 -0000

On 5/3/13 2:26 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
> 
> On May 3, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/7/13 10:43 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> I did a quick read of this version, in section 4, shouldn't we be
>>> looking at the RURI, instead of the To header?
>>
>> I don't quite understand your statement. Could you expand it a bit or
>> propose specific text that you think needs to change?
>>
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Section 4 has the following text:
> 
> " Therefore
>    we assume that the To header of a request received by a SIMPLE-XMPP
>    gateway will contain a sip: or sips: URI.  The gateway SHOULD resolve
>    that address to an im: URI for SIP MESSAGE requests,"
> 
> I think we should say RURI instead of To header there, because the To header is not used for routing and in case of GRUU usage (like in the example) the only way for a request to be properly routed would be to put it in the RURI. So I'd say:
> 
> " Therefore
>    we assume that the  Request-URI of a request received by a SIMPLE-XMPP
>    gateway will contain a sip: or sips: URI.  The gateway SHOULD resolve
>    that address to an im: URI for SIP MESSAGE requests,"

Yes, that is better. Thanks for the correction. To track this fix, I've
also updated Table 5 in source control.

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email