IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stox] [dispatch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-im-03.txt

Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com> Fri, 03 May 2013 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <saul@ag-projects.com>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C28921F8EC2 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 13:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.688
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mHCfNMFRbutH for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 13:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sipthor.net (node06.dns-hosting.info [85.17.186.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EA621F8BDE for <stox@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 May 2013 13:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.sipthor.net (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 8A3CBB35DE; Fri, 3 May 2013 22:26:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.99.48] (ip3e830637.speed.planet.nl [62.131.6.55]) by mail.sipthor.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C173EB017C; Fri, 3 May 2013 22:26:45 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com>
In-Reply-To: <51841069.7030008@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 22:26:44 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5C0D4541-66B5-4126-805A-9AD9D27D2188@ag-projects.com>
References: <20130405023718.11095.85523.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <515E391A.3030800@stpeter.im> <EDB618A5-C6D0-470F-8357-758EBA9C0F15@ag-projects.com> <51841069.7030008@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: stox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] [dispatch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-im-03.txt
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 20:26:53 -0000

On May 3, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:

> On 4/7/13 10:43 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>> 
>> I did a quick read of this version, in section 4, shouldn't we be
>> looking at the RURI, instead of the To header?
> 
> I don't quite understand your statement. Could you expand it a bit or
> propose specific text that you think needs to change?
> 

Hi!

Section 4 has the following text:

" Therefore
   we assume that the To header of a request received by a SIMPLE-XMPP
   gateway will contain a sip: or sips: URI.  The gateway SHOULD resolve
   that address to an im: URI for SIP MESSAGE requests,"

I think we should say RURI instead of To header there, because the To header is not used for routing and in case of GRUU usage (like in the example) the only way for a request to be properly routed would be to put it in the RURI. So I'd say:

" Therefore
   we assume that the  Request-URI of a request received by a SIMPLE-XMPP
   gateway will contain a sip: or sips: URI.  The gateway SHOULD resolve
   that address to an im: URI for SIP MESSAGE requests,"


Cheers,

--
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
AG Projects

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email