IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stox] current status

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Fri, 06 September 2013 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B2C11E81A0 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.025
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.025 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.296, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PTLL+qa8WSBF for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x229.google.com (mail-qa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B29311E8199 for <stox@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id hu16so596347qab.14 for <stox@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HLziuEjQZV1wF0n09aXXvyuycb8L+CIcjM8Yz/co1Gs=; b=gNHYMcxLhPkOXyj6uUJDHlrBdKWMeBi+oXyEXk+P/zMuAgoqb81y+mPKIvQDLpz5qs ns9dCaG0dg0n/662wFb/ibHHSrdVXxamVGQTuqD10ZQjGK5O6hCi5kIiljoqQ03EuivP P32V1P3Wyda7GrzKcLlzvCdPgQA4u+9Y1ZWX3/aO3TrVOlHofSxMZMIr5iXpXMoLqaYj 3S6UH+IApXnpq1Tlpkd15IbY8AbzBEQuVMoCAiWwHrAAESTIrSptQ7Z+SIK99cOiFdrY J4Pw2ycg0ExwUbz3WjQ9PXGcDM/EfMLKcHe+uWVzxcUGTmsypzmihApaIdh2imYIKfQS xbDw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.120.1 with SMTP id b1mr2921462qar.96.1378485753631; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.71.243 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <522A046A.3050105@stpeter.im>
References: <52294513.8080407@stpeter.im> <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7620A099FB8@008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com> <8EFEDB10-B1D2-4D58-80A1-BDC24BF1EA8E@ag-projects.com> <522A046A.3050105@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:42:33 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN55w9Woj671-5_6ba=M25RE5FmiRU_G_1O1W8FbAJX1Sg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2d6e6ac5dfb04e5b9b9e0"
Cc: stox@ietf.org, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com>, "<Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com>" <Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Stox] current status
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:42:35 -0000

On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 9/6/13 10:16 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 6, 2013, at 3:25 PM, <Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com>
> > <Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> There have been a fair number of comments on -core, -im and
> >> -presence since the Berlin IETF. Please take a look at the new
> >> versions http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-stox-core-04.txt
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-stox-im-02.txt
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-stox-presence-04.txt and see
> >> if your issues have been properly addressed, and/or whether you
> >> want to still raise any new issues.
> >>
> >> If nothing specific comes up, the chairs will consider starting
> >> WG LC on these documents in the near future.
> >>
> >> One thing that I wonder about -core is whether it is a good idea
> >> to stabilize or last call it yet at this point, since there have
> >> been some issues raised about -media that might have impact to
> >> -core, such as dealing with SIP side forking or loop detection.
> >> So is it better to wait with -core until -media is more stable?
> >>
> >
> > At some point we agreed that those issues would be handled in
> > -media, because in other cases (chat, presence, im) the gateway is
> > itself the endpoint and handles all the "media", so those didn't
> > seem to apply.
>
> That is my recollection, too.
>
 [MB] That was also what I thought when I reviewed -core. [/MB]

Thus I'd be in favor of stabilizing the -core spec, and hanlding the
> forking issues in the -media spec.
>
[MB] I agree. [/MB]

>
> Peter
>
> - --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSKgRqAAoJEOoGpJErxa2p4GUP/2bzG8+WbRPcn0JpREhws+T5
> m3WBrq0OoJryDzxaA2HmBq15TBawWzsVce5dp4oOY73G9HsPxCyDHrPYiN/SBxhK
> VTSrIid3GCd9s0uTNEgPIwcQ6DFJy5f3nxdo2YWgmm+ncJ7hvuSXSGoDCammAyX0
> nGci5VPoesbj+LZaebSPgFDHX7jtVElqloR2wpHYxmTh+P34sXGuKneQH43wYdM7
> seOMpsD8yyfwRUqvhglUf4H46maQvYENTDCFsk5XjbcWoJLK52+N+Pwkw9ofr6DZ
> no/j5xPLY1mr3FTE0MTgMn0Nq3YSCD4M3jLrsjjdudvlQvLcItWIK4x9OO8JaaFx
> 5+AWtrCjn6yu/NKLgY8M5zhju51T8/srn1sBzxCQNkj5dNykbhp2W/Qo2Y+eahF1
> cZEOhmTTALEpbqvtGxZBg/p9kSugwk3q4oAlP875JlBS+VLiiFXc6MIeXqWHS9yf
> X2KXJj3xNrh1Esp/Z2FG/W5+uz+e9tT2IlevhKcNozFs+gyJHeD/KwZZ3Oc3/Hqj
> 4RkFcLW+8iXFqH1EozpYFcr7WOhNRlh2KtbBON/w9o7481i35HRG8cR0TtFZ//By
> pqTdVWZhwYH3PR9B4+6cY53Lk5aWoL5RGX5DYMPluHuJGcPW99VORRE8RRo4eepC
> nTGO/i5/5W8SC+EE3hO7
> =6RTC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> stox mailing list
> stox@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email