Re: [Stox] review of -im

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 09 December 2013 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC31A1AE2FE for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 07:47:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FTJxCnRkCx0i for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 07:47:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80371AE28C for <stox@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 07:47:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ergon.local (unknown [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FE9A4010C; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 08:47:13 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <52A5E600.3050103@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 08:47:12 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>, stox@ietf.org
References: <648368DC-1BD5-4D6A-B4E0-3D72B2EB3A6D@jitsi.org> <52A45A33.5090708@goodadvice.pages.de>
In-Reply-To: <52A45A33.5090708@goodadvice.pages.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Stox] review of -im
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:47:22 -0000

On 12/8/13 4:38 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
> Am 04.12.2013 14:17, schrieb Yana Stamcheva:
>> This is a reminder for the WGLC on:
>>
>> draft-ietf-stox-im-05 : http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-stox-im-05
>> draft-ietf-stox-chat-03 :
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-stox-chat-03
>>
>> Less than a week left until the deadline December 9, 2013.
>>
>> If you've reviewed the documents, please don't forget to send a note
>> to the list with any remaining issues you may have found or just that
>> you find the documents complete.
> 
> Looking good to me, even though I think that numbering the examples
> would be highly appreciated by readers.

Yes. The examples in the other documents have numbers, so it's an
oversight that these don't.

> table 1: might be worth mentioning that type has no mapping since we're
> only dealing with single instant messages for which this is not set.

That's true as far as it goes, but I think this document is making the
more general claim that there's no direct mapping of XMPP message 'type'
values (such as "chat", "headline", and "groupchat") to SIP headers.

> table 2: Request-URI or To can map to 'to', right?

Correct.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/