Re: [Stox] review of -im

[Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]>]

On 12/8/13 4:38 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
> Am 04.12.2013 14:17, schrieb Yana Stamcheva:
>> This is a reminder for the WGLC on:
>>
>> draft-ietf-stox-im-05 : http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-stox-im-05
>> draft-ietf-stox-chat-03 :
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-stox-chat-03
>>
>> Less than a week left until the deadline December 9, 2013.
>>
>> If you've reviewed the documents, please don't forget to send a note
>> to the list with any remaining issues you may have found or just that
>> you find the documents complete.
> 
> Looking good to me, even though I think that numbering the examples
> would be highly appreciated by readers.

Yes. The examples in the other documents have numbers, so it's an
oversight that these don't.

> table 1: might be worth mentioning that type has no mapping since we're
> only dealing with single instant messages for which this is not set.

That's true as far as it goes, but I think this document is making the
more general claim that there's no direct mapping of XMPP message 'type'
values (such as "chat", "headline", and "groupchat") to SIP headers.

> table 2: Request-URI or To can map to 'to', right?

Correct.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/