Re: [sunset4] CGN document for consideration
Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Tue, 01 May 2012 22:44 UTC
Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B547221E8055 for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 15:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.676
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TNKi+mWi+Q-3 for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 15:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blues.viagenie.ca (blues.viagenie.ca [66.228.45.110]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7EB21E8050 for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2012 15:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.190] (modemcable180.211-203-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.203.211.180]) by blues.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D89E41C281; Tue, 1 May 2012 18:44:28 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_10AD98DE-D1D3-4597-BDDC-DD49F4D1D14C"
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CBC5AB36.48FD%repenno@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 18:44:27 -0400
Message-Id: <CE14F254-CB25-45BD-8E45-36940E0E1711@viagenie.ca>
References: <CBC5AB36.48FD%repenno@cisco.com>
To: Reinaldo Penno <repenno@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: sunset4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sunset4] CGN document for consideration
X-BeenThere: sunset4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: sunset4 working group discussion list <sunset4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sunset4>
List-Post: <mailto:sunset4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 22:44:30 -0000
the current charter milestones are: 1) Review current Carrier-Grade NAT (CGN) documents … determine if CGN is a suitable sunsetting technology to become a work item... 2) Gap analysis of IPv4 features to facilitate IPv4 sunsetting Your document says: " This document focuses solely on NAPT44…" How do you see your document fulfilling milestone 1 or 2 ? Marc. Le 2012-05-01 à 18:01, Reinaldo Penno a écrit : > Hi, > > I would like to submit this document to the WG for consideration. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-penno-behave-rfc4787-5382-5508-bis-02 > > I'm assuming that port allocation method drafts should be submitted to > this WG. > > Thanks, > > Reinaldo > > > _______________________________________________ > sunset4 mailing list > sunset4@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
- [sunset4] CGN document for consideration Reinaldo Penno
- Re: [sunset4] CGN document for consideration Marc Blanchet
- Re: [sunset4] CGN document for consideration Reinaldo Penno
- Re: [sunset4] CGN document for consideration Marc Blanchet
- Re: [sunset4] CGN document for consideration George, Wes