Re: [sunset4] CGN document for consideration
Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Wed, 02 May 2012 00:19 UTC
Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B62A21E8086 for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 17:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gGZezpyWUbP0 for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 17:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blues.viagenie.ca (blues.viagenie.ca [66.228.45.110]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781B821E8020 for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2012 17:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.190] (modemcable180.211-203-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.203.211.180]) by blues.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 534861C281; Tue, 1 May 2012 20:19:30 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1821AAD3-F441-4552-8621-A0AD6CFC0330"
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CBC5BEC3.490B%repenno@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 20:19:29 -0400
Message-Id: <A47AB00C-A622-42C4-8A13-89BB900CCC64@viagenie.ca>
References: <CBC5BEC3.490B%repenno@cisco.com>
To: Reinaldo Penno <repenno@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: sunset4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sunset4] CGN document for consideration
X-BeenThere: sunset4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: sunset4 working group discussion list <sunset4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sunset4>
List-Post: <mailto:sunset4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 00:19:32 -0000
Le 2012-05-01 à 19:27, Reinaldo Penno a écrit : > Hi Marc, > > A CGN is a NAPT44 which shares IP address across subscribers. It is fundamentally NAPT44. yes, I know what it is … ;-) , but: as the charter says, we need to demonstrate/convince that CGN is an IPv4 sunsetting technology, based on the following criteria: <charter_extract> before the working group adopts any technology, it must: 1) describe the problem to be solved and show that there is widespread demand for a solution 2) demonstrate that the problem can not be solved with existing technologies 3) provide a description of the proposed solution along with the impact on current IPv4-only use and its ability to promote the deployment of IPv6 </charter_extract> This is what the charter says. So before adopting CGN documents, we need to demonstrate that CGN is a sunset4 technology. When demonstrated, then we can work on CGN/NAPT44 topics. Right now, based on charter, we can't yet work on CGN/NAPT44. Marc. > > Thanks, > > Reinaldo > > From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> > Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 18:44:27 -0400 > To: Reinaldo Penno <repenno@cisco.com> > Cc: <sunset4@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [sunset4] CGN document for consideration > >> the current charter milestones are: >> 1) Review current Carrier-Grade NAT (CGN) documents … determine if CGN is >> a suitable sunsetting technology to become a work item... >> 2) Gap analysis of IPv4 features to facilitate IPv4 sunsetting >> >> Your document says: " This document focuses solely on NAPT44…" >> >> How do you see your document fulfilling milestone 1 or 2 ? >> >> Marc. >> >> Le 2012-05-01 à 18:01, Reinaldo Penno a écrit : >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to submit this document to the WG for consideration. >>> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-penno-behave-rfc4787-5382-5508-bis-02 >>> >>> I'm assuming that port allocation method drafts should be submitted to >>> this WG. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Reinaldo >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sunset4 mailing list >>> sunset4@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4 >> > _______________________________________________ > sunset4 mailing list > sunset4@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
- [sunset4] CGN document for consideration Reinaldo Penno
- Re: [sunset4] CGN document for consideration Marc Blanchet
- Re: [sunset4] CGN document for consideration Reinaldo Penno
- Re: [sunset4] CGN document for consideration Marc Blanchet
- Re: [sunset4] CGN document for consideration George, Wes