Re: [sunset4] IP on draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf

On 19 Sep 2017, at 9:54, Jacques Latour wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I know I'm late on the reviewing part, but just wondering how the 
> policing part will work, who will ensure the "IETF work will 
> explicitly support IPv6" activities?

I think that this is out of the wg remit and shall be handled by IESG. 
My guess is there will be many implications that the IESG will have to 
deal with.

Marc.

>
> Second, as an example, when this come in effect, would this draft 
> "https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09" 
> specifically exclude IPv4 specifications, meaning this new framework 
> work should only be applied to IPv6, and ideally make IPv6 feature 
> rich vs. IPv4.
>
> Jacques
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sunset4 [mailto:sunset4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lee 
> Howard
> Sent: September 19, 2017 9:37 AM
> To: MarcBlanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
> Cc: draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf@ietf.org; sunset4@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [sunset4] IP on draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf
>
> Lol
> I know of no IPR related to this draft.
>
> Lee
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Sep 19, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Marc Blanchet 
>> <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> wrote:
>>
>> Dear author,
>> please state if you have direct, personal knowledge of any IPR 
>> related to this document (draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf), and if yes, 
>> was it disclosed, in conformance with BCPs 78 and 79.
>>
>> Regards, Marc, document shepherd
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sunset4 mailing list
>> sunset4@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sunset4 mailing list
> sunset4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4