IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sunset4] IP on draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf

Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org> Tue, 19 September 2017 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <lee@asgard.org>
X-Original-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C9D132D18 for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1GvFMUH0IkAI for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob06.registeredsite.com (atl4mhob06.registeredsite.com [209.17.115.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 658351321C9 for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.211]) by atl4mhob06.registeredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v8JFUBFP005863 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 11:30:14 -0400
Received: (qmail 25268 invoked by uid 0); 19 Sep 2017 15:30:11 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 68.100.68.25
X-Authenticated-UID: lee@asgard.org
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.160?) (lee@asgard.org@68.100.68.25) by 0 with ESMTPA; 19 Sep 2017 15:30:10 -0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.2.170228
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 11:30:09 -0400
From: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
To: Jacques Latour <Jacques.Latour@cira.ca>, MarcBlanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
CC: "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <D5E6AEE7.8630F%lee@asgard.org>
Thread-Topic: [sunset4] IP on draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf
References: <A2FA7C51-3326-485D-A3F7-2FEE8B3EC521@viagenie.ca> <379DC2F9-4553-472B-88EC-56A1AE47D214@asgard.org> <ad25cb260d8c4031b94dfb7eefdae918@cira.ca>
In-Reply-To: <ad25cb260d8c4031b94dfb7eefdae918@cira.ca>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sunset4/rhqxb6KcGrJh2yG6P66LEEuazPQ>
Subject: Re: [sunset4] IP on draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf
X-BeenThere: sunset4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: sunset4 working group discussion list <sunset4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sunset4/>
List-Post: <mailto:sunset4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:30:25 -0000



On 9/19/17, 9:54 AM, "sunset4 on behalf of Jacques Latour"
<sunset4-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Jacques.Latour@cira.ca> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I know I'm late on the reviewing part, but just wondering how the
>policing part will work, who will ensure the "IETF work will explicitly
>support IPv6" activities?

Policing requires a policy to be in effect, and this document creates that
policy.

It gives the IESG a consensus-based document to use in their work.


>
>Second, as an example, when this come in effect, would this draft
>"https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09"
>specifically exclude IPv4 specifications, meaning this new framework work
>should only be applied to IPv6, and ideally make IPv6 feature rich vs.
>IPv4.

While I look forward to that day, this document doesn’t do that.
I think the NVO multicast document would be covered by "No IPv4-only
feature will be added unless
      there's an equivalent feature added in the IPv6 version.”


>
>Jacques

Lee


>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: sunset4 [mailto:sunset4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lee Howard
>Sent: September 19, 2017 9:37 AM
>To: MarcBlanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
>Cc: draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf@ietf.org; sunset4@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [sunset4] IP on draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf
>
>Lol 
>I know of no IPR related to this draft.
>
>Lee
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Sep 19, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
>>wrote:
>> 
>> Dear author,
>> please state if you have direct, personal knowledge of any IPR related
>>to this document (draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf), and if yes, was it
>>disclosed, in conformance with BCPs 78 and 79.
>> 
>> Regards, Marc, document shepherd
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> sunset4 mailing list
>> sunset4@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>sunset4 mailing list
>sunset4@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
>
>_______________________________________________
>sunset4 mailing list
>sunset4@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email