Re: [sunset4] future of dnssec?

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 22 February 2017 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19A41298D2 for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 06:03:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XTl8PA7t13Fs for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 06:03:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 996F21298BF for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 06:03:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id u188so3257567qkc.2 for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 06:03:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=33viqxXHhL1IUtL2eZha9rWE7x603ibn/69nNEjcL58=; b=I5LLz32f2Jx6xrFZRFOr0WTcDQg5hStr3Oyf1QaAdSVmWJLopz8BewumYC0vQDt942 9Gw6cio3icwNUeTrqUkUxkZOS/FLlwwuIRO8dfOnMrNfYyUzVXD+7vGfoy1VpAYt91pn 0uYi06aO0etXq99Wz/0d/uhYrhpwNJqNkbfyMfWCpImeCuleyabJGsdTLExqkkT6aQWK S5JeugzUruj/eyyU27KoKuMuxjBX6hfyYK9kS2hovGOnjm2UiLzHe6tWo6mPiH+fggsi G5mp5VjhzpvI9M9u/j2Z7KLxv2DKtmJma6lN8NNBCm5Cdhry/RT/4tXbW4xzp7C1JkIO AP8w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=33viqxXHhL1IUtL2eZha9rWE7x603ibn/69nNEjcL58=; b=LiTY9XKNCnXyGLo/vCHRJiD3cjGixLv1cSZ2Kh+owjGYUkCXIiwrQv0MoQW4J3H/uO QgwDbnVda5tf3jKF0AM22IdkjZkCwCOpM0JlLe3QoovzKT1DUHP+7R7m9137nep3ASLT QvdCgAXn4HoU0x7mHkAjPW+q8c/mkB/phlsJ3zVRxPcEeSNfY63ixdQ0JDmGAXwBdZFb Zlw8oMvhQWEeRJmn4BCjjxsTqF0XbNS2s/4ls8ffwYCTt+DkWv0A8r/COy19E7T1gEDh JWR89PeYKg566IAKNzLHuJVR+RPDd9eI8G8bPQ8xWfTcDCUy+Cx40FNxX0sB3s/nuY9m 9Xgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kZRtTtx28vO5VwUd6pDbqU1bgBbE6aJSXlhgrvZK5h1IG0iIfINqykjpTNyLjwXQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.201.218 with SMTP id m87mr32985921qkl.176.1487772200696; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 06:03:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o190sm706077qkc.65.2017.02.22.06.03.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 06:03:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <1D4AF716-822C-4B54-866E-76585B58E1FE@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_34C4BD77-FE32-4D77-BA09-DF504FCC2084"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:03:16 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGQxi-6wxqEWRwLKc_1c4ocnQEm6RNA9ZCHzhqUTKJj88g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
References: <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21334D566F0@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <CAD6AjGQxi-6wxqEWRwLKc_1c4ocnQEm6RNA9ZCHzhqUTKJj88g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sunset4/OsyabhmFu4y9oZg49XhIU8LC3XI>
Cc: "Heatley, Nick" <nick.heatley@ee.co.uk>, "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sunset4] future of dnssec?
X-BeenThere: sunset4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: sunset4 working group discussion list <sunset4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sunset4/>
List-Post: <mailto:sunset4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 14:03:24 -0000

Operating systems don't support EDNS0: resolvers do.   What do you mean when you say "no mobile operating system supports EDNS0"?

> On Feb 22, 2017, at 8:51 AM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:23 AM Heatley, Nick <nick.heatley@ee.co.uk <mailto:nick.heatley@ee.co.uk>> wrote:
> Post exhaustion, the majority of cellular networks and some public wifi networks will use DNS64.
> 
> DNSSEC and DNS64 do not get along. DNSSEC for “A records only” is broken.
> 
> Is this the reason why all content must go v6?
> 
> Or is the case for DNSSEC still questionable?
> 
> 
> It is demonstrably true that the case for DNSSEC is questioned by smart people. 
> 
> Let's assume that dnssec adds value.
> 
> 
> We cannnot do any dnssec without EDNS0. 
> 
> And, no mobile operating system i am aware of supports EDNS0
> 
> So first, we need to solve the EDNS0 issue and the total lack of mobile end point support  
> 
> Then, we may discuss how having ipv6 and aaaa is a requirement (thusly no dns64) for dnssec to function correctly end to end. 
> 
> 
> Or do end hosts need to perform DNS64 so “DNSSEC for A records only” can be intact?
> 
>  
> 
> NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
> This email contains BT information, which may be privileged or confidential. It's meant only for the individual(s) or entity named above. 
> If you're not the intended recipient, note that disclosing, copying, distributing or using this information is prohibited. 
> If you've received this email in error, please let me know immediately on the email address above. Thank you.
> 
> We monitor our email system, and may record your emails.
> 
> EE Limited 
> Registered office:Trident Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9BW
> Registered in England no: 02382161
> 
> EE Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of:
> 
> British Telecommunications plc
> Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ
> Registered in England no: 1800000
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sunset4 mailing list
> sunset4@ietf.org <mailto:sunset4@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4>
> _______________________________________________
> sunset4 mailing list
> sunset4@ietf.org <mailto:sunset4@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4>