Re: [sunset4] future of dnssec?

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 22 February 2017 21:23 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1947129B70 for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:23:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kj8d9hSvyc_1 for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:23:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39FA9129B6E for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:23:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id x71so15374844qkb.3 for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:23:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=X+CqmyYspBd8yc+EOwGd1qusvyqfM88XzpdKfojlJO4=; b=nwKqfbEu6IjFSSRg24byT8Z3RZyktVV4rvQeKluCZXfviOPSMU0GeK7VII9v7moo2T QOWT+Ve009jWTQoqFwN2wDZ8KJBmxwCl5pEnF8eKFmjEBe5eIhuwM5ltwxjEb8BbVgy3 yjtFjIzpsvMtzaYrlW60THFKpe2H5GdLZFDXBX3SGeoTO/1qhTola2bEmioax3Qj3U4D 1kMXdzB1IctX1cnvmmaXPhlvyu0oJcByLgSSRObCwc9hb0cIvZ8HwzzvWtlX59Ir7twh flWdlLEJvqmdxA4SNPftae/hu3JZi05m8hjCnMRIJGmPI4hmjshKvJJKjkYGt3YIg6kx TjbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=X+CqmyYspBd8yc+EOwGd1qusvyqfM88XzpdKfojlJO4=; b=aCVRSV5FNVMUQCeYXxBRL270gJDgYv1bJR6jVb5j4yWiyjksDCHScHqUt9NNyHalIU igJk+NygYpiL4eEQZ2wSn1bue10jR57QI9lFrqFeEZWkGJzaHnGgHHaHgTTNqETO81cs Lq/acc99n8LsHAY6x0etlzHfOO4kNVndl4elVN+IIRFxvsoKdI3b99Vx+Uo3vDQfh+KH Hh/8YD0RtbcDjssJHZTBbiMFVAqSbFotbnNrWCfAiQSZiAwwiNVWjRcgyngoOrhQdDKl ZvaXDALvYFpPG1Io2YEr2fA7VbcXiKD5HWyTXHYDVzAXStaKw+7HbgEpX5WhKKb8Kdyk IChA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nvmhDr1JP6oDEWsD2g+73D/aESMj/8ByCr5FkinaH38L9pkOdT7SAQyPt8O4eMOA==
X-Received: by 10.55.88.66 with SMTP id m63mr34609470qkb.270.1487798630346; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:23:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 45sm1454045qts.40.2017.02.22.13.23.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:23:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <6645ABEB-D7FD-4FDC-ACF8-332EB230BCB4@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1C986E76-CD55-4CE4-8AD1-8676639431C4"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:23:47 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20170222212004.9F5E46455E2A@rock.dv.isc.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21334D566F0@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <B5E8C545-55B9-4ECB-B0C8-C3EEFEECD320@fugue.com> <20170222143629.9E9C56454B08@rock.dv.isc.org> <AC554B0E-709B-474D-97BD-C2518CED2266@fugue.com> <20170222212004.9F5E46455E2A@rock.dv.isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sunset4/VmVR7aqYdNSAvDPCCfcfxxkCd9I>
Cc: "Heatley, Nick" <nick.heatley@ee.co.uk>, "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sunset4] future of dnssec?
X-BeenThere: sunset4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: sunset4 working group discussion list <sunset4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sunset4/>
List-Post: <mailto:sunset4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 21:23:53 -0000

On Feb 22, 2017, at 4:20 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
> And have managed to update EVERY DNSSEC validator in the DNS path
> from the DNS64 server to the final DNSSEC validator to do DNS64
> prefix discovery and that you are willing to forego any other use
> of AAAA records other than to lookup host addresses.

Given that the number of such validators is typically zero, this isn't a particularly daunting task.