Re: [sunset4] Mandating use of IPv6 in examples

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Wed, 06 April 2016 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1904b28184=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD9112D0C7 for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 06:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ky49ZUh0BkOO for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 06:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.com (mail.consulintel.com [213.0.69.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B74BC12D517 for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 06:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.com, Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:11:37 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.26] by mail.consulintel.com (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50000387353.msg for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:11:36 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.com, Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:11:36 +0200 (not processed: spam filter heuristic analysis disabled)
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Return-Path: prvs=1904b28184=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: sunset4@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.160212
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:11:27 -0300
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: sunset4@ietf.org
Message-ID: <CCFC5474-3773-4D43-BA66-DC6D06AE3E26@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [sunset4] Mandating use of IPv6 in examples
References: <5704F8BA.20400@gmail.com> <570504F7.1030708@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <570504F7.1030708@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sunset4/Qx8Z4p33zW74-u1E9tSL2NL0XQk>
Subject: Re: [sunset4] Mandating use of IPv6 in examples
X-BeenThere: sunset4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: sunset4 working group discussion list <sunset4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sunset4/>
List-Post: <mailto:sunset4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:12:14 -0000

+1

Saludos,
Jordi









-----Mensaje original-----
De: sunset4 <sunset4-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
Responder a: <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
Fecha: miércoles, 6 de abril de 2016, 9:45
Para: <sunset4@ietf.org>
Asunto: Re: [sunset4] Mandating use of IPv6 in examples

>
>  
>    
>  
>  
>    Hi,
>        This makes sense to me.  I totally agree.
>        If I might suggest a minor change.., I would add in section 3
>      the text "section 4" after RFC 5952 [RFC5952]:
>      
>      ---
>      RFC 5952 [RFC5952] section 4 recommends to use the compressed
>      format for IPv6
>         address textual representation.  For instance, leading zeros
>      MUST be
>         suppressed, the use of the symbol "::" MUST be used to its
>      maximum
>         capability and the characters "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", and "f"
>      in an
>         IPv6 address MUST be represented in lowercase.
>      --  
>      
>      Regards,
>      
>      Alejandro,
>      
>      
>      El 4/6/2016 a las 7:23 AM, Andrei Robachevsky escribió:
>    
>    
>      Hi,
>
>I recently submitted an I-D
>draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples-00.txt, mandating use
>of IPv6 in examples in RFCs.
>
>I was reading some pretty recent drafts and noticed that authors
>continue using IPv4 in their examples. This is probably more convenient,
>but is not really forward thinking. Also, the prevalence of IPv6
>examples will send a strong message that IPv4 is essentially a legacy
>protocol.
>
>I wonder if this WG is interested in progressing this document as a WG
>item.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Andrei
>
>
>
>      
>        Name:		draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples
>Revision:	00
>Title:		Mandating use of IPv6 in examples
>Document date:	2016-03-21
>Group:		Individual Submission
>Pages:		3
>URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples-00.txt
>Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples/
>Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples-00
>
>
>Abstract:
>   IPv6 is a successor of the legacy IPv4 protocol.  This document
>   mandates use of IPv6 in examples provided in RFCs.
>
>      
>
>      
>      
>      
>      
>      _______________________________________________
>sunset4 mailing list
>sunset4@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
>    
>
>    
>  
>
>_______________________________________________
>sunset4 mailing list
>sunset4@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4